Algorithmic Profiling: Effective Tool for Targeting Active Labour Market Policies?

ABSTRACT Digitisation has sparked interest in automated decision making in Public Employment Services (PES). We evaluate an algorithmic profiling model in Austria that predicts the reemployment prospects of unemployed individuals to classify and assign them to active labour market policies. Our analysis shows that reallocating resources from jobseekers with low to medium prospects, as proposed by the PES, does not yield the expected efficiency gains. We find no systematic evidence that programmes are less effective for individuals with low predicted employment prospects than for those with medium prospects. These findings caution against crude algorithmic profiling and highlight the need for nuanced targeting strategies that prioritise the most disadvantaged jobseekers. JEL Classification: J24, J64, J68

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Labour
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.70013
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Profiling: Effective Tool for Targeting Active Labour Market Policies?

Rainer Eppel, Ulrike Huemer, Lukas Schmoigl, Helmut Mahringer
Labour
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

Algorithmic Profiling: Effective Tool for Targeting Active Labour Market Policies?

Rainer Eppel, Ulrike Huemer, Lukas Schmoigl, Helmut Mahringer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digitisation has sparked interest in automated decision making in Public Employment Services (PES). We evaluate an algorithmic profiling model in Austria that predicts the reemployment prospects of unemployed individuals to classify and assign them to active labour market policies. Our analysis shows that reallocating resources from jobseekers with low to medium prospects, as proposed by the PES, does not yield the expected efficiency gains. We find no systematic evidence that programmes are less effective for individuals with low predicted employment prospects than for those with medium prospects. These findings caution against crude algorithmic profiling and highlight the need for nuanced targeting strategies that prioritise the most disadvantaged jobseekers. JEL Classification: J24, J64, J68

Labour
Austrian Institute of Economic Research (AT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.