Conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis biochars: comparative mechanistic insights, structural evolution, and environmental remediation applications

Abstract The dual challenges of waste biomass disposal and escalating contamination by inorganic, organic, and emerging microplastic pollutants demand sustainable, circular remediation strategies. Biochar, a carbon-rich, porous material produced through the thermal decomposition of biomass, has emerged as a multifunctional sorbent capable of adsorbing pollutants, enhancing soil quality, and sequestering carbon. This review critically compares biochars synthesized via conventional pyrolysis (CP) and microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAP), highlighting their physicochemical differences, sorption mechanisms, and contaminant removal efficiencies. As a key novelty, this review presents the first mechanistically integrated comparison of CP and MAP biochars in relation to their structural characteristics and performance relationships. Factors such as temperature, reactor design, and pyrolysis method significantly influence the properties of biochar, including surface area, porosity, pH, carbon content, and adsorption capacity. Comparative analysis indicates that MAP offers advantages over CP, including faster volumetric heating, higher product yield, enhanced specific surface area, greater selectivity for targeted contaminants, and potentially improved energy efficiency under optimized conditions. The review discusses biochar functionalization, adsorption-reduction methods, and optimization for contaminants such as heavy metals, dyes, medicines, and microplastics. Beyond remediation, biochar is used for soil improvement, composting, catalysis, and electrode materials. Key information gaps persist, including a mechanistic understanding of contaminant interactions, long-term stability, and MAP scalability. Addressing these gaps is critical for optimizing biochar for targeted remediation, incorporating MAP-derived biochar into circular bioeconomy and carbon-neutral methods, and directing the development of next-generation biochars for sustainable pollution management and resource recovery. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biochar
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-026-00601-3
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis biochars: comparative mechanistic insights, structural evolution, and environmental remediation applications

Silvie Heviánková, Kateřina Brožová, Eva Pertile, Petra Malíková et al.
Biochar
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis biochars: comparative mechanistic insights, structural evolution, and environmental remediation applications

Silvie Heviánková, Kateřina Brožová, Eva Pertile, Petra Malíková, Jitka Chromíková, Silvie Drabinová, Oldřich Motyka, Jan Halfar, Kristina Čabanová, Atta Rasool
article en

Abstract

Abstract The dual challenges of waste biomass disposal and escalating contamination by inorganic, organic, and emerging microplastic pollutants demand sustainable, circular remediation strategies. Biochar, a carbon-rich, porous material produced through the thermal decomposition of biomass, has emerged as a multifunctional sorbent capable of adsorbing pollutants, enhancing soil quality, and sequestering carbon. This review critically compares biochars synthesized via conventional pyrolysis (CP) and microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAP), highlighting their physicochemical differences, sorption mechanisms, and contaminant removal efficiencies. As a key novelty, this review presents the first mechanistically integrated comparison of CP and MAP biochars in relation to their structural characteristics and performance relationships. Factors such as temperature, reactor design, and pyrolysis method significantly influence the properties of biochar, including surface area, porosity, pH, carbon content, and adsorption capacity. Comparative analysis indicates that MAP offers advantages over CP, including faster volumetric heating, higher product yield, enhanced specific surface area, greater selectivity for targeted contaminants, and potentially improved energy efficiency under optimized conditions. The review discusses biochar functionalization, adsorption-reduction methods, and optimization for contaminants such as heavy metals, dyes, medicines, and microplastics. Beyond remediation, biochar is used for soil improvement, composting, catalysis, and electrode materials. Key information gaps persist, including a mechanistic understanding of contaminant interactions, long-term stability, and MAP scalability. Addressing these gaps is critical for optimizing biochar for targeted remediation, incorporating MAP-derived biochar into circular bioeconomy and carbon-neutral methods, and directing the development of next-generation biochars for sustainable pollution management and resource recovery. Graphical Abstract

BiocharVol. 8(1)
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ)
European Commission, Ministerstvo Životního Prostředí
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.