Biological Cardiovascular Age Derived from Coronary CTA Reports Using a Large Language Model: A Novel Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events?

Background/Objectives: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment is based on chronological age and other clinical factors, with inherent limitations and poor accuracy. Objective was to estimate the artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced biological cardiovascular age calculation derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) reports using a large language model (LLM), in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods: Coronary CTA reports were analyzed using a LLM (ChatGPT-4.0v, OpenAI), from symptomatic patients with suspected CAD who underwent coronary CTA for clinical indications. Patients in which the LLM successfully analyzed the key metrics (1) coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and (2) coronary CTA reports (coronary stenosis severity (CAD-RADS), high-risk anatomy, non-calcified plaque, cardiac function (LVEF and others) were included. Results: 386 CTA reports were uploaded, and 346 (89.6%) included. The mean biological age (bioAGE) was 57.2 ± 10.9 and the chronological 58.5 ± 10.8 years. 137 (39.6%) were women. The intra-individual deviation in bioAGE was high (median: 8.8; IQR 9.98). BioAGE exceeded chronological age in 45.4% patient and was lower or equal in 54.6%) MACE rate was 8.7% comprising 2 deaths, 5 myocardial infarctions, and 22 late revascularizations. The accuracy for prediction of MACE was higher for bioAGE (c = 0.768; 95% CI: 0.681–0.855, p < 0.001) compared to chronological age (c = 0.590; 95% CI: 0.492–0.689, p = 0.102) Conclusions: Biological age calculation from coronary CTA reports using LLM is feasible, yet intra-individual deviations are high. The accuracy for prediction of MACE is improved by bioAGE compared to chronological.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16091298
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological Cardiovascular Age Derived from Coronary CTA Reports Using a Large Language Model: A Novel Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events?

Leonhard Gruber, Philipp Spitaler, Valentin Bilgeri, Malik Galijašević et al.
Diagnostics
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Biological Cardiovascular Age Derived from Coronary CTA Reports Using a Large Language Model: A Novel Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events?

Leonhard Gruber, Philipp Spitaler, Valentin Bilgeri, Malik Galijašević, Yannick Scharll, Johannes Deeg, Gerlig Widmann, Pietro G. Lacaita, Gudrun M. Feuchtner, Michael Swoboda
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment is based on chronological age and other clinical factors, with inherent limitations and poor accuracy. Objective was to estimate the artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced biological cardiovascular age calculation derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) reports using a large language model (LLM), in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods: Coronary CTA reports were analyzed using a LLM (ChatGPT-4.0v, OpenAI), from symptomatic patients with suspected CAD who underwent coronary CTA for clinical indications. Patients in which the LLM successfully analyzed the key metrics (1) coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and (2) coronary CTA reports (coronary stenosis severity (CAD-RADS), high-risk anatomy, non-calcified plaque, cardiac function (LVEF and others) were included. Results: 386 CTA reports were uploaded, and 346 (89.6%) included. The mean biological age (bioAGE) was 57.2 ± 10.9 and the chronological 58.5 ± 10.8 years. 137 (39.6%) were women. The intra-individual deviation in bioAGE was high (median: 8.8; IQR 9.98). BioAGE exceeded chronological age in 45.4% patient and was lower or equal in 54.6%) MACE rate was 8.7% comprising 2 deaths, 5 myocardial infarctions, and 22 late revascularizations. The accuracy for prediction of MACE was higher for bioAGE (c = 0.768; 95% CI: 0.681–0.855, p < 0.001) compared to chronological age (c = 0.590; 95% CI: 0.492–0.689, p = 0.102) Conclusions: Biological age calculation from coronary CTA reports using LLM is feasible, yet intra-individual deviations are high. The accuracy for prediction of MACE is improved by bioAGE compared to chronological.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(9)
Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.