Adjacent Segment Kinematics After Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Fusion

Study Design: Retrospective motion analysis of prospectively collected IDE imaging data from subjects treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical total disc replacement (cTDR). Objective: To quantify adjacent segment motion from preoperative assessment through 7 years postoperatively and evaluate how fusion versus motion preservation at the index level influences adjacent-level kinematics. Summary of Background Data: Fusion eliminates motion at the treated segment, often leading to compensatory increases in adjacent-level motion. In contrast, cTDR preserves motion at the index level, but its long-term effect on adjacent segment mechanics remains unclear. Methods: Flexion-extension radiographs were obtained from an IDE trial comparing Mobi-C and ACDF. Adjacent levels demonstrating >5 degrees of motion in subjects with analyzed C2–C7 range of motion (ROM) were included. Sagittal plane rotation between maximal flexion and extension at adjacent levels and overall C2–C7 ROM were measured using an automated, FDA-cleared spinal motion analysis system. Assessments were performed preoperatively and through 7 years postoperatively. Results: Superior adjacent-level rotation remained within ±3 degrees in both cohorts; however, the ACDF group demonstrated a significantly greater increase at 24 months ( P =0.048). Inferior adjacent-level rotation increased postoperatively in the ACDF cohort and gradually declined at later follow-up, with significantly greater motion than cTDR at 6 months ( P =0.0001) and 12 months ( P =0.0005). The contribution of the superior adjacent level to total C2–C7 flexion-extension motion was significantly higher in the ACDF cohort at all time points ( P <0.0001), as were inferior adjacent-level contributions ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Over 7 years, cTDR maintained stable adjacent segment motion, whereas ACDF led to compensatory increases in adjacent-level motion and greater adjacent segment contributions to overall cervical mobility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000002061
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjacent Segment Kinematics After Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Fusion

Amy A. Claeson, Pierce D. Nunley, Seth C. Coomer, Trevor F. Grieco et al.
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Adjacent Segment Kinematics After Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Fusion

Amy A. Claeson, Pierce D. Nunley, Seth C. Coomer, Trevor F. Grieco, John A. Hipp, Richard D. Guyer
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective motion analysis of prospectively collected IDE imaging data from subjects treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical total disc replacement (cTDR). Objective: To quantify adjacent segment motion from preoperative assessment through 7 years postoperatively and evaluate how fusion versus motion preservation at the index level influences adjacent-level kinematics. Summary of Background Data: Fusion eliminates motion at the treated segment, often leading to compensatory increases in adjacent-level motion. In contrast, cTDR preserves motion at the index level, but its long-term effect on adjacent segment mechanics remains unclear. Methods: Flexion-extension radiographs were obtained from an IDE trial comparing Mobi-C and ACDF. Adjacent levels demonstrating >5 degrees of motion in subjects with analyzed C2–C7 range of motion (ROM) were included. Sagittal plane rotation between maximal flexion and extension at adjacent levels and overall C2–C7 ROM were measured using an automated, FDA-cleared spinal motion analysis system. Assessments were performed preoperatively and through 7 years postoperatively. Results: Superior adjacent-level rotation remained within ±3 degrees in both cohorts; however, the ACDF group demonstrated a significantly greater increase at 24 months ( P =0.048). Inferior adjacent-level rotation increased postoperatively in the ACDF cohort and gradually declined at later follow-up, with significantly greater motion than cTDR at 6 months ( P =0.0001) and 12 months ( P =0.0005). The contribution of the superior adjacent level to total C2–C7 flexion-extension motion was significantly higher in the ACDF cohort at all time points ( P <0.0001), as were inferior adjacent-level contributions ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Over 7 years, cTDR maintained stable adjacent segment motion, whereas ACDF led to compensatory increases in adjacent-level motion and greater adjacent segment contributions to overall cervical mobility.

Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine PublicationVol. 39(4)
Northridge Hospital Medical Center (US), Colorado Joint Replacement (US), Spine Institute of Louisiana (US), Protein Metrics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.