A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) informed exploration of a primary care intervention to support deprescribing for problematic polypharmacy in older adults living with frailty (DEPPLOY) in England: a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION: The incorporation of deprescribing into structured medication reviews (SMR) is a patient-centred and cost-effective practice in primary care settings. Pharmacists have a key role in deprescribing among older people to improve quality of life and reduce adverse events, but patients and healthcare professionals may be resistant to reducing their medication, and evidence around how deprescribing happens in practice is currently lacking. This study explores the implementation of a co-designed intervention in a single English General Practice (UK). AIM: To explore key stakeholders' perceptions of a co-designed primary care intervention to involve patients and their families in deprescribing and its broader intervention context, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CIFR). METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured interview study with a purposive sample of staff, and patients with frailty, to explore perceptions of the deprescribing initiative. Data were analysed using an a priori framework structured by the domains of the CIFR. RESULTS: Interviews (24 in total) were conducted with 13 staff involved in delivering the intervention and 5 patients living with frailty who completed a structured medication review with recommended medication changes. Key factors (mapped to CFIR domains) included: an imperative for formal training around the intervention delivery (Inner setting), engagement with SMR delivery linked to payment through national agendas (Outer setting); the importance of the fit of the intervention with existing processes around prescribing practice and infrastructure (Inner setting); increased understanding of the aims of deprescribing among patients and recognition of the extended pharmacist role in primary care deprescribing (Individuals); recognition that the successful delivery of the intervention was a team effort (Implementation process). CONCLUSION: Structured medication reviews are a suitable mechanism to discuss and make deprescribing decisions as part of a shared consultation. Resources which support the patient through the deprescribing process can engage patients and promote greater satisfaction with service delivery. Operationally, staff can also benefit from tools which facilitate greater understanding of the process and fit within their usual practice plus improving patient care and saving medication costs. Barriers and facilitators to implementation success should be noted and addressed for upscaling and process sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-026-02140-0
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) informed exploration of a primary care intervention to support deprescribing for problematic polypharmacy in older adults living with frailty (DEPPLOY) in England: a qualitative study

Jonathan Silcock, Jonathan Benn, N Butt, Amrit Daffu-O’Reilly et al.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) informed exploration of a primary care intervention to support deprescribing for problematic polypharmacy in older adults living with frailty (DEPPLOY) in England: a qualitative study

Jonathan Silcock, Jonathan Benn, N Butt, Amrit Daffu-O’Reilly, Beth Fylan, Aliya Darr, Hannah Hartley, Alison Bravington, Daisy Halligan, D Petty, George Peat, L Breen, D. K Theo Raynor, Syed Tabish Zaidi, David P. Alldred
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The incorporation of deprescribing into structured medication reviews (SMR) is a patient-centred and cost-effective practice in primary care settings. Pharmacists have a key role in deprescribing among older people to improve quality of life and reduce adverse events, but patients and healthcare professionals may be resistant to reducing their medication, and evidence around how deprescribing happens in practice is currently lacking. This study explores the implementation of a co-designed intervention in a single English General Practice (UK). AIM: To explore key stakeholders' perceptions of a co-designed primary care intervention to involve patients and their families in deprescribing and its broader intervention context, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CIFR). METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured interview study with a purposive sample of staff, and patients with frailty, to explore perceptions of the deprescribing initiative. Data were analysed using an a priori framework structured by the domains of the CIFR. RESULTS: Interviews (24 in total) were conducted with 13 staff involved in delivering the intervention and 5 patients living with frailty who completed a structured medication review with recommended medication changes. Key factors (mapped to CFIR domains) included: an imperative for formal training around the intervention delivery (Inner setting), engagement with SMR delivery linked to payment through national agendas (Outer setting); the importance of the fit of the intervention with existing processes around prescribing practice and infrastructure (Inner setting); increased understanding of the aims of deprescribing among patients and recognition of the extended pharmacist role in primary care deprescribing (Individuals); recognition that the successful delivery of the intervention was a team effort (Implementation process). CONCLUSION: Structured medication reviews are a suitable mechanism to discuss and make deprescribing decisions as part of a shared consultation. Resources which support the patient through the deprescribing process can engage patients and promote greater satisfaction with service delivery. Operationally, staff can also benefit from tools which facilitate greater understanding of the process and fit within their usual practice plus improving patient care and saving medication costs. Barriers and facilitators to implementation success should be noted and addressed for upscaling and process sustainability.

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
University of Tasmania (AU), University of Leeds (GB), University of Bradford (GB), Northumbria University (GB), Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Keele University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, University of Leeds
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.