Audiometric Outcomes and Longitudinal Trends of Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Bilateral Deafness: A 20-Year Single-Center Study

Background Examine the outcomes and trends of second-side cochlear implant (CI) in adults as measured by change in speech perception scores with a focus on those meeting age-requirements for Medicare. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic center including adult patients with bilateral hearing loss receiving a sequential, bilateral CI between 2001-2020. Bilateral speech perception scores under best-aided conditions were compared following first- and second-side CI using Arizona Biomedical (AzBio) Sentence Test, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word (CNC-W), and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). Individual Changes in audiometric scores and trends in implant age and inter-implant interval were evaluated. Results 162 individuals were included in this study. 50 patients with AzBIO scores, 40 patients with HINT scores, and 72 patients with CNC-W scores demonstrated mean improvements of 11.8 (95%CI: [5.7 - 17.9]), 6.7 (95%CI: [0.4 - 13.7]), 12.0 (SD: 25.3), and 11.5 (95%CI: [7.3-15.7]) points respectively following second-sided CI. Patients aged 65 and older experienced similar magnitude of improvement as younger patients. (t-tests: AzBio: 95% CI [-16.7, 17.4]; HINT: 95% CI [-34.6,0.5]; CNC-W: 95% CI [-10.7,13.1]). Longer time interval between implants was associated with reduced improvement in CNC-W in the overall population (β: -2.9, 95%CI:[-5.5 - -1.2]) and the elderly population ((β: -4.24, 95%CI:[-6.1 - -2.8]) specifically. Over time, there were no significant changes in age of CI-1 implant or audiometric scores after bilateral CI, but there was a decrease in inter-implant interval. Conclusions Intervention with a second-sided cochlear implant was associated with improved speech recognition scores and this benefit extended to patients aged 65 and over. Decreased inter-implant interval is associated with an increase in audiometric improvement between first- and second- CI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology and Neurotology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000551866
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audiometric Outcomes and Longitudinal Trends of Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Bilateral Deafness: A 20-Year Single-Center Study

Nicholas S. Andresen, Sarek Shen, Zahra N. Sayyid, Dawn Marsiglia et al.
Audiology and Neurotology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Audiometric Outcomes and Longitudinal Trends of Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Bilateral Deafness: A 20-Year Single-Center Study

Nicholas S. Andresen, Sarek Shen, Zahra N. Sayyid, Dawn Marsiglia, Charles Della Santina, Steve Bowditch, Courtney Carver, Daniel Q. Sun, Jennifer Yeagle
article en

Abstract

Background Examine the outcomes and trends of second-side cochlear implant (CI) in adults as measured by change in speech perception scores with a focus on those meeting age-requirements for Medicare. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic center including adult patients with bilateral hearing loss receiving a sequential, bilateral CI between 2001-2020. Bilateral speech perception scores under best-aided conditions were compared following first- and second-side CI using Arizona Biomedical (AzBio) Sentence Test, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word (CNC-W), and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). Individual Changes in audiometric scores and trends in implant age and inter-implant interval were evaluated. Results 162 individuals were included in this study. 50 patients with AzBIO scores, 40 patients with HINT scores, and 72 patients with CNC-W scores demonstrated mean improvements of 11.8 (95%CI: [5.7 - 17.9]), 6.7 (95%CI: [0.4 - 13.7]), 12.0 (SD: 25.3), and 11.5 (95%CI: [7.3-15.7]) points respectively following second-sided CI. Patients aged 65 and older experienced similar magnitude of improvement as younger patients. (t-tests: AzBio: 95% CI [-16.7, 17.4]; HINT: 95% CI [-34.6,0.5]; CNC-W: 95% CI [-10.7,13.1]). Longer time interval between implants was associated with reduced improvement in CNC-W in the overall population (β: -2.9, 95%CI:[-5.5 - -1.2]) and the elderly population ((β: -4.24, 95%CI:[-6.1 - -2.8]) specifically. Over time, there were no significant changes in age of CI-1 implant or audiometric scores after bilateral CI, but there was a decrease in inter-implant interval. Conclusions Intervention with a second-sided cochlear implant was associated with improved speech recognition scores and this benefit extended to patients aged 65 and over. Decreased inter-implant interval is associated with an increase in audiometric improvement between first- and second- CI.

Audiology and Neurotology
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.