Laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies in pediatric patients

To report a multicenter experience with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pediatric urachal anomalies and to compare laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted approaches. A retrospective review was performed of all patients with urachal remnants treated with MIS between January 2019 and January 2025. Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Twenty-three patients (13 males) with a median age of 5.9 years (range 6 months–14 years) underwent surgery for symptomatic urachal anomalies. Fifteen patients (65.2%) were treated laparoscopically and eight (34.8%) robotically. Complete excision was achieved in all cases. Median operative time was 45 min (range 33–73). A bladder catheter was maintained for 24 h postoperatively, and all patients were discharged within 48–72 h. Histopathology confirmed urachal remnants without evidence of malignancy. No intraoperative complications occurred. One minor postoperative complication (Clavien–Dindo I) was reported. Median follow-up was 2 years (range 5 months–6 years). MIS represents the gold standard for the treatment of urachal remnants. Both laparoscopy and robotic-assisted surgery are safe and effective. The robotic approach may offer ergonomic and technical advantages. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence appears to facilitate lesion identification and guide dissection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Surgery International
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-026-06434-2
Primary Topic
Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies in pediatric patients

Giovanni Boroni, Marco Castagnetti, Claudia Di Mento, Daniele Alberti et al.
Pediatric Surgery International
Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
article

Laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies in pediatric patients

Giovanni Boroni, Marco Castagnetti, Claudia Di Mento, Daniele Alberti, Maria Escolino, Fulvia Del Conte, Francesco Tedesco, Francesca Carraturo, Tristan Till, Claudia Esposito, Giorgia Esposito, Roberta Guglielmini, Michele Bosisio, Vincenzo Coppola
article en

Abstract

To report a multicenter experience with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pediatric urachal anomalies and to compare laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted approaches. A retrospective review was performed of all patients with urachal remnants treated with MIS between January 2019 and January 2025. Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Twenty-three patients (13 males) with a median age of 5.9 years (range 6 months–14 years) underwent surgery for symptomatic urachal anomalies. Fifteen patients (65.2%) were treated laparoscopically and eight (34.8%) robotically. Complete excision was achieved in all cases. Median operative time was 45 min (range 33–73). A bladder catheter was maintained for 24 h postoperatively, and all patients were discharged within 48–72 h. Histopathology confirmed urachal remnants without evidence of malignancy. No intraoperative complications occurred. One minor postoperative complication (Clavien–Dindo I) was reported. Median follow-up was 2 years (range 5 months–6 years). MIS represents the gold standard for the treatment of urachal remnants. Both laparoscopy and robotic-assisted surgery are safe and effective. The robotic approach may offer ergonomic and technical advantages. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence appears to facilitate lesion identification and guide dissection.

Pediatric Surgery InternationalVol. 42(1)
Nanyang Technological University (SG), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.