Neanderthal brain and cognition reconsidered

would have comfortably fit within the range found among modern human populations-which are generally not considered evolutionarily significant. In fact, the endocranial differences between Neanderthal and their contemporaries predict cognitive difference effect sizes of only 0.14 SDs or less. This undermines the suggestion that Neanderthal replacement occurred because of cognitive limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2426638123
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neanderthal brain and cognition reconsidered

P. Thomas Schoenemann, Guoyuan Yang, Ralph L. Holloway, Jia-Hong Gao
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Neanderthal brain and cognition reconsidered

P. Thomas Schoenemann, Guoyuan Yang, Ralph L. Holloway, Jia-Hong Gao
article en

Abstract

would have comfortably fit within the range found among modern human populations-which are generally not considered evolutionarily significant. In fact, the endocranial differences between Neanderthal and their contemporaries predict cognitive difference effect sizes of only 0.14 SDs or less. This undermines the suggestion that Neanderthal replacement occurred because of cognitive limitations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(19)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Stone Age Institute (US), Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute (CN), Resonance Research (United States) (US), Indiana University (US), Columbia University (US)
John Templeton Foundation
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.