Does Participating in Agricultural Global Value Chains Promote Agricultural Growth?

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between GVC participation and agricultural value‐added growth in 43 countries over the period 1995–2022. In contrast to prior literature, we disaggregate the agricultural sector into four sub‐sectors namely crop cultivation, animal production, forestry and fishing. Using EXIOBASE‐3 multi‐regional input‐output data, we analyze how backward and forward GVCs affect agricultural growth. The empirical findings reveal that backward GVC participation significantly boosts value‐added growth in agriculture, particularly in crop cultivation and forestry. In developing countries, both backward and forward linkages positively influence agricultural and forestry value‐added, while backward participation adversely affects animal production growth. On the other hand, in developed countries, backward participation exhibits growth‐enhancing effects across agriculture, animal production, and forestry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70104
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Participating in Agricultural Global Value Chains Promote Agricultural Growth?

Taner Turan, Halit Yanıkkaya, Hüseyin Alperen Özer
Agribusiness
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Does Participating in Agricultural Global Value Chains Promote Agricultural Growth?

Taner Turan, Halit Yanıkkaya, Hüseyin Alperen Özer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between GVC participation and agricultural value‐added growth in 43 countries over the period 1995–2022. In contrast to prior literature, we disaggregate the agricultural sector into four sub‐sectors namely crop cultivation, animal production, forestry and fishing. Using EXIOBASE‐3 multi‐regional input‐output data, we analyze how backward and forward GVCs affect agricultural growth. The empirical findings reveal that backward GVC participation significantly boosts value‐added growth in agriculture, particularly in crop cultivation and forestry. In developing countries, both backward and forward linkages positively influence agricultural and forestry value‐added, while backward participation adversely affects animal production growth. On the other hand, in developed countries, backward participation exhibits growth‐enhancing effects across agriculture, animal production, and forestry.

Agribusiness
Gebze Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.