Bridging Curricula and Workplaces in China: A Needs-Based Model for Arabic Business Communication
This study addresses the persistent misalignment between Arabic language curricula in Chinese universities and the communicative demands of Arabic-mediated business work. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, we surveyed 105 Chinese graduates who use Arabic in professional settings and conducted follow-up interviews with three lecturers responsible for Arabic for Business Purposes (ABP) courses. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed three reliable constructs: teaching methodology, workplace ability, and future training needs, while regression analyses showed that learner-centered, task-based teaching methodologies significantly predict graduates’ perceived workplace ability and heighten their awareness of ongoing training needs. The qualitative findings illuminated high-stakes communicative events such as negotiations, client correspondence, and intercultural meetings, and revealed systematic gaps between academic instruction and workplace discourse practices. Integrating quantitative and qualitative strands, the study proposes a dual-layer instructional model consisting of eight developmental stages and five interrelated competence domains that link classroom tasks to authentic business communication events. The model offers a contextualized pathway for redesigning ABP curricula in China and contributes to wider debates on how language-for-specific-purposes programmes can better support employability and professional communication readiness.
Authors
- Suo Yan Mei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8126-7871)
- Zarima Mohd Zakaria (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-2621)
- Suo Yan Ju
Institutions
- Sultan Idris Education University (MY)
- International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
- Published
- 2026-04-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906261419048
- Primary Topic
- Arabic Language Education Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00