Transitioning from INA-CBG to INA-DRG: Implementation Challenges and the Role of AI-Augmented Claim Verification in Indonesian Hospitals

Background. Indonesia's national health insurance program (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional, JKN), administered by BPJS Kesehatan, has used the Indonesia Case Based Groups (INA-CBG) prospective payment system since 2014. The Ministry of Health and the National Casemix Center (NCC) are transitioning toward Indonesia Diagnosis Related Groups (INA-DRG), modeled on internationally established DRG systems. As of early 2026, the transition is in a parallel-running and pilot expansion phase. Objective. This paper analyzes the structural, operational, and information-system implications of the INA-CBG to INA-DRG transition for Indonesian hospitals, and examines the role of AI-augmented claim verification tools as a mitigation mechanism for documentation and coding gaps during the transition period. Methods. We combined a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature on DRG implementation in low- and middle-income countries, regulatory document analysis of Kemenkes and BPJS Kesehatan publications, and an anonymized aggregate analysis of inpatient claim verification metrics collected from a multi-site Indonesian hospital cohort during 2024–2026, derived from de-identified aggregate metrics generated during routine claim verification workflows. Results. Approximately 41% of primary diagnoses and 53% of secondary diagnoses use unspecified ICD-10 codes; 22% of cases contain zero documented secondary diagnoses. Under simulated INA-DRG classification, ~18% of cases shift upward and ~14% downward in severity tier, with direction strongly associated with hospital class. The within-DRG documentation premium ranges 40-80% of base tariff for common adult medical and surgical DRGs. Conclusion. The INA-DRG transition is best understood as an institutional change in clinical documentation practice, not a software upgrade. Hospitals supported by AI-augmented verification tooling and SATUSEHAT-aligned data infrastructure are positioned to capture revenue that less prepared peers are likely to lose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19818767
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transitioning from INA-CBG to INA-DRG: Implementation Challenges and the Role of AI-Augmented Claim Verification in Indonesian Hospitals

Choirunnisa Hapsari
Open MIND
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

Transitioning from INA-CBG to INA-DRG: Implementation Challenges and the Role of AI-Augmented Claim Verification in Indonesian Hospitals

Choirunnisa Hapsari
article en

Abstract

Background. Indonesia's national health insurance program (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional, JKN), administered by BPJS Kesehatan, has used the Indonesia Case Based Groups (INA-CBG) prospective payment system since 2014. The Ministry of Health and the National Casemix Center (NCC) are transitioning toward Indonesia Diagnosis Related Groups (INA-DRG), modeled on internationally established DRG systems. As of early 2026, the transition is in a parallel-running and pilot expansion phase. Objective. This paper analyzes the structural, operational, and information-system implications of the INA-CBG to INA-DRG transition for Indonesian hospitals, and examines the role of AI-augmented claim verification tools as a mitigation mechanism for documentation and coding gaps during the transition period. Methods. We combined a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature on DRG implementation in low- and middle-income countries, regulatory document analysis of Kemenkes and BPJS Kesehatan publications, and an anonymized aggregate analysis of inpatient claim verification metrics collected from a multi-site Indonesian hospital cohort during 2024–2026, derived from de-identified aggregate metrics generated during routine claim verification workflows. Results. Approximately 41% of primary diagnoses and 53% of secondary diagnoses use unspecified ICD-10 codes; 22% of cases contain zero documented secondary diagnoses. Under simulated INA-DRG classification, ~18% of cases shift upward and ~14% downward in severity tier, with direction strongly associated with hospital class. The within-DRG documentation premium ranges 40-80% of base tariff for common adult medical and surgical DRGs. Conclusion. The INA-DRG transition is best understood as an institutional change in clinical documentation practice, not a software upgrade. Hospitals supported by AI-augmented verification tooling and SATUSEHAT-aligned data infrastructure are positioned to capture revenue that less prepared peers are likely to lose.

Open MIND
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.