Effective Partnerships Between Local Councils and Health Departments: Lessons From a Disadvantaged Region of Sydney, Australia

Background: Local councils in Australia, established by state governments, are responsible for delivering services, implementing policies, and enforcing regulations that impact community health and well-being. Partnerships between local governments and health agencies can provide a valuable opportunity to advance initiatives to improve health and well-being of communities. This paper explores findings from four case studies of such partnerships in south-west Sydney, Australia. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 key stakeholders were conducted as part of a realist evaluation of these partnerships, focusing on factors at functional, organisational, individual, and external levels that influence their success. Results: The findings provide real-world insights into the enablers and barriers of effective intersectoral partnerships. While the interview data generally align with existing literature and the theory of change developed in earlier research phases, key context-specific differences emerged. The interviews reiterated the need for structural support of the partnerships (in the case studies, through a context specific, locally tailored memorandum of understanding [MoU]) however, structures alone were insufficient, partnerships required "actors" to enable implementation (the partnership officers). Beyond the MoU and partnership officers, wider supports provided by partner organisation through governance, management and workplans were also essential. Stakeholders expressed strong support for these partnerships, citing positive outcomes and the importance of their continuation. However, persistent challenges include sectoral interests and institutional silos that hinder collaboration. The findings underscore the complexity of expecting councils to adopt a health-focused mandate or vice versa. Conclusion: The study highlights that partnerships, facilitated through MoUs and joint officer appointments, are effective in driving impactful health initiatives. Nevertheless, overcoming organisational silos requires ongoing leadership support and mandates that emphasize the importance of these partnerships. This research emphasizes the critical role of structured collaborations in addressing health determinants and reducing potential inequities within communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.9045
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective Partnerships Between Local Councils and Health Departments: Lessons From a Disadvantaged Region of Sydney, Australia

Maria Beer, Jennie Pry, Edith Barnes, Patrick John Harris et al.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Community Health and Development
article

Effective Partnerships Between Local Councils and Health Departments: Lessons From a Disadvantaged Region of Sydney, Australia

Maria Beer, Jennie Pry, Edith Barnes, Patrick John Harris, Raquiba Jahan Khan, Karen Wardle, Karla Jaques, Christopher Browne, Tim Hayes, Susan Gibbeson
article en

Abstract

Background: Local councils in Australia, established by state governments, are responsible for delivering services, implementing policies, and enforcing regulations that impact community health and well-being. Partnerships between local governments and health agencies can provide a valuable opportunity to advance initiatives to improve health and well-being of communities. This paper explores findings from four case studies of such partnerships in south-west Sydney, Australia. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 key stakeholders were conducted as part of a realist evaluation of these partnerships, focusing on factors at functional, organisational, individual, and external levels that influence their success. Results: The findings provide real-world insights into the enablers and barriers of effective intersectoral partnerships. While the interview data generally align with existing literature and the theory of change developed in earlier research phases, key context-specific differences emerged. The interviews reiterated the need for structural support of the partnerships (in the case studies, through a context specific, locally tailored memorandum of understanding [MoU]) however, structures alone were insufficient, partnerships required "actors" to enable implementation (the partnership officers). Beyond the MoU and partnership officers, wider supports provided by partner organisation through governance, management and workplans were also essential. Stakeholders expressed strong support for these partnerships, citing positive outcomes and the importance of their continuation. However, persistent challenges include sectoral interests and institutional silos that hinder collaboration. The findings underscore the complexity of expecting councils to adopt a health-focused mandate or vice versa. Conclusion: The study highlights that partnerships, facilitated through MoUs and joint officer appointments, are effective in driving impactful health initiatives. Nevertheless, overcoming organisational silos requires ongoing leadership support and mandates that emphasize the importance of these partnerships. This research emphasizes the critical role of structured collaborations in addressing health determinants and reducing potential inequities within communities.

International Journal of Health Policy and ManagementVol. 15
Fairfield Hospital (AU), Liverpool City Council (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU), South Western Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Western Sydney Local Health District
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.