CBCT Accuracy in Detecting Interproximal Caries with and without Amalgam Restorations

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting interproximal caries in human extracted teeth with and without amalgam restorations. Materials and Methods: This study included 200 human posterior extracted teeth. One hundred teeth had proximal amalgam restorations, and 100 were unrestored. All specimens were scanned using Planmeca ProMax 3D CBCT (FOV 8×8 cm; voxel size 0.2 mm). Caries presence was determined histologically (gold standard) and scored using ICDAS criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were calculated. Logistic regression assessed the influence of amalgam on diagnostic performance. Results: CBCT demonstrated lower sensitivity and specificity in teeth with amalgam compared to unrestored teeth. Beam-hardening artifacts significantly influenced diagnostic reliability (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although CBCT shows acceptable diagnostic performance for interproximal caries detection, the presence of amalgam restorations moderately reduces accuracy. Conventional bitewing radiography should remain the primary modality when metallic restorations are present.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry 3000
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1232
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CBCT Accuracy in Detecting Interproximal Caries with and without Amalgam Restorations

Ali Hakiem Tawfieq
Dentistry 3000
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

CBCT Accuracy in Detecting Interproximal Caries with and without Amalgam Restorations

Ali Hakiem Tawfieq
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting interproximal caries in human extracted teeth with and without amalgam restorations. Materials and Methods: This study included 200 human posterior extracted teeth. One hundred teeth had proximal amalgam restorations, and 100 were unrestored. All specimens were scanned using Planmeca ProMax 3D CBCT (FOV 8×8 cm; voxel size 0.2 mm). Caries presence was determined histologically (gold standard) and scored using ICDAS criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were calculated. Logistic regression assessed the influence of amalgam on diagnostic performance. Results: CBCT demonstrated lower sensitivity and specificity in teeth with amalgam compared to unrestored teeth. Beam-hardening artifacts significantly influenced diagnostic reliability (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although CBCT shows acceptable diagnostic performance for interproximal caries detection, the presence of amalgam restorations moderately reduces accuracy. Conventional bitewing radiography should remain the primary modality when metallic restorations are present.

Dentistry 3000Vol. 14(1)
University of Diyala (IQ)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.