Mental Health and Climate Change Policy in Australia: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT Climate change increasingly threatens mental health, yet Australian policy responses have largely neglected this connection. This scoping review analysed 25 national and state‐level policies across climate change, mental health and wellbeing, and climate‐health domains using a structured thematic framework. Findings reveal that climate policies broadly reference health but rarely address mental health specifically. Mental health policies seldom mention climate change, despite mounting evidence of its psychological impacts. Climate‐health policies offered the most integrated approach but remain limited in number. Only seven policies included concrete, actionable strategies. Nine key themes emerged, including systems and services, priority populations, resilience, workforce, research, and policy. Most policies emphasised awareness over implementation. Jurisdictions with dedicated climate‐health policies—such as the Federal Government, Queensland, and Victoria—demonstrated stronger engagement. Barriers include service gaps in regional areas, poor emergency integration, and insufficient data. Strengthening policy requires embedding mental health in climate adaptation, leveraging co‐benefits, and fostering cross‐sector collaboration to build climate resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70080
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental Health and Climate Change Policy in Australia: A Scoping Review

Joemer C Maravilla, Suhailah Ali, Sanam Ahmadzada, Anne Cleary et al.
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Mental Health and Climate Change Policy in Australia: A Scoping Review

Joemer C Maravilla, Suhailah Ali, Sanam Ahmadzada, Anne Cleary, Fiona Charlson, Tanya Mara F. Gagalac, Celine Ogg
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Climate change increasingly threatens mental health, yet Australian policy responses have largely neglected this connection. This scoping review analysed 25 national and state‐level policies across climate change, mental health and wellbeing, and climate‐health domains using a structured thematic framework. Findings reveal that climate policies broadly reference health but rarely address mental health specifically. Mental health policies seldom mention climate change, despite mounting evidence of its psychological impacts. Climate‐health policies offered the most integrated approach but remain limited in number. Only seven policies included concrete, actionable strategies. Nine key themes emerged, including systems and services, priority populations, resilience, workforce, research, and policy. Most policies emphasised awareness over implementation. Jurisdictions with dedicated climate‐health policies—such as the Federal Government, Queensland, and Victoria—demonstrated stronger engagement. Barriers include service gaps in regional areas, poor emergency integration, and insufficient data. Strengthening policy requires embedding mental health in climate adaptation, leveraging co‐benefits, and fostering cross‐sector collaboration to build climate resilience.

Asia & the Pacific Policy StudiesVol. 13(2)
The University of Queensland (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU), Far Eastern University (PH)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.