Potential futures for the IPCC’s approach to artificial intelligence
During the first six assessment cycles of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not widely available. This has rapidly changed. The IPCC will need to make choices about how to use artificial intelligence powered applications in literature identification, literature assessment, and communicating the contents of the report. These are not merely technical decisions, but sociopolitical challenges, as the IPCC has a social function of creating a shared basis of reality for addressing climate change. To explore these challenges, this paper describes four scenarios of potential AI development: rapid adoption of AI agents, perceptions of superior AI reliability, caution among the research community, and public backlash to AI. If the IPCC can navigate these emergent challenges, there is an opportunity for it to serve as a learning opportunity for other institutions grappling with how to do scientific assessment in a world with generative AI. Developments in generative Artificial Intelligence and society’s perception of its safety shape four distinct scenarios of genAI use, from fast adoption to public backlash, that will shape socio-political challenges for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Authors
- Oliver Geden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-4218)
- Holly Jean Buck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-1238)
- Shinichiro Asayama
- Alaa Al Khourdajie
Institutions
- Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (DE)
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
- National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Earth & Environment
- Published
- 2026-04-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03514-y
- Primary Topic
- Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme