Opposing patterns in eating behaviors following bariatric surgery versus lifestyle-induced weight loss

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate 12-month changes in eating behaviors and metabolic outcomes following bariatric surgery or lifestyle-induced weight loss. METHODS: This study is a longitudinal secondary analysis comparing data from two independent prospective cohorts: bariatric surgery (n = 19) and lifestyle-induced weight loss intervention (n = 19). Body weight, body composition (Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer - DEXA), and metabolic parameters (blood samples, Oral Glucose Tolerance test - OGTT) were measured, and eating behaviors were assessed using validated questionnaires (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, Binge-Eating Scale) at baseline, at 5-6 months, and at 12 months after the intervention initiation. RESULTS: Bariatric surgery produced greater weight loss (surgery -28.1 ± 8.1 kg vs lifestyle -8.9 ± 7.9 kg; p < 0.001) and larger improvements in metabolic markers than lifestyle-induced weight loss. Despite these differences, eating-behavior trajectories diverged. Bariatric surgery was from baseline to 12 months associated with stable or decreased eating restraint, whereas lifestyle-induced weight loss led to an increase in restraint (cognitive restraint: surgery -0.05 ± 0.7 vs lifestyle +6.4 ± 0.9; p < 0.001; restrained eating: surgery -0.7 ± 0.1 vs lifestyle +0.6 ± 0.2; p < 0.001). Both interventions reduced disinhibited eating, binge eating, and external eating. Hunger-related outcomes also improved in both interventions, but with different signatures: surgery was accompanied by reduced hunger perception and cue-reactivity, whereas lifestyle-induced weight loss was characterized by increased reliance on deliberate cognitive/behavioral control strategies. When changes in eating behaviors were analyzed per 1% body weight lost, the opposing pattern in restraint remained significant, and the lifestyle group showed a larger increase in restraint and a greater relative reduction in susceptibility to hunger compared with surgery. Exploratory item-level patterns supported these profiles, suggesting fewer cue-driven triggers to overeat after surgery and greater use of conscious restraint strategies after lifestyle-induced weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle-induced weight loss was associated with increased cognitive restraint, whereas bariatric surgery resulted in stable or decreased restraint. Both interventions decreased hunger sensations, likely through adaptive learning in the lifestyle group and physiological changes after surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346240
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opposing patterns in eating behaviors following bariatric surgery versus lifestyle-induced weight loss

Laura Vuorela, Bram J. Berntzen, Vesa Koivukangas, Anne Juuti et al.
PLoS ONE
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Opposing patterns in eating behaviors following bariatric surgery versus lifestyle-induced weight loss

Laura Vuorela, Bram J. Berntzen, Vesa Koivukangas, Anne Juuti, Sini Heinonen, Maheswary Muniandy, Tuure Saarinen, Aila Rissanen, Sanna Meriläinen, Kirsi Virtanen, Kirsi H. Pietiläinen, Per-Henrik Groop, Laura Suojanen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate 12-month changes in eating behaviors and metabolic outcomes following bariatric surgery or lifestyle-induced weight loss. METHODS: This study is a longitudinal secondary analysis comparing data from two independent prospective cohorts: bariatric surgery (n = 19) and lifestyle-induced weight loss intervention (n = 19). Body weight, body composition (Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer - DEXA), and metabolic parameters (blood samples, Oral Glucose Tolerance test - OGTT) were measured, and eating behaviors were assessed using validated questionnaires (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, Binge-Eating Scale) at baseline, at 5-6 months, and at 12 months after the intervention initiation. RESULTS: Bariatric surgery produced greater weight loss (surgery -28.1 ± 8.1 kg vs lifestyle -8.9 ± 7.9 kg; p < 0.001) and larger improvements in metabolic markers than lifestyle-induced weight loss. Despite these differences, eating-behavior trajectories diverged. Bariatric surgery was from baseline to 12 months associated with stable or decreased eating restraint, whereas lifestyle-induced weight loss led to an increase in restraint (cognitive restraint: surgery -0.05 ± 0.7 vs lifestyle +6.4 ± 0.9; p < 0.001; restrained eating: surgery -0.7 ± 0.1 vs lifestyle +0.6 ± 0.2; p < 0.001). Both interventions reduced disinhibited eating, binge eating, and external eating. Hunger-related outcomes also improved in both interventions, but with different signatures: surgery was accompanied by reduced hunger perception and cue-reactivity, whereas lifestyle-induced weight loss was characterized by increased reliance on deliberate cognitive/behavioral control strategies. When changes in eating behaviors were analyzed per 1% body weight lost, the opposing pattern in restraint remained significant, and the lifestyle group showed a larger increase in restraint and a greater relative reduction in susceptibility to hunger compared with surgery. Exploratory item-level patterns supported these profiles, suggesting fewer cue-driven triggers to overeat after surgery and greater use of conscious restraint strategies after lifestyle-induced weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle-induced weight loss was associated with increased cognitive restraint, whereas bariatric surgery resulted in stable or decreased restraint. Both interventions decreased hunger sensations, likely through adaptive learning in the lifestyle group and physiological changes after surgery.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
University of Helsinki (FI), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Turku University Hospital (FI), Kuopio University Hospital (FI), Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FI), Folkhälsans Forskningscentrum (FI), Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (FI), Monash University (AU), University of Oulu (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri, Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö, Jalmari ja Rauha Ahokkaan Säätiö, Academy of Finland, Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö, Sydäntutkimussäätiö, Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö, Orionin Tutkimussäätiö, Paulon Säätiö, Paavo Nurmen Säätiö, Novo Nordisk Fonden, Diabetestutkimussäätiö
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.