Bi-linguistic performance of large language models in multimodal analysis for differentiating jawbone-destroying malignancy from osteomyelitis

Differentiating jawbone-destroying malignancy from osteomyelitis remains a major diagnostic challenge in oral and maxillofacial surgery because these entities share overlapping radiologic features but require fundamentally different management strategies. This study evaluated the bi-linguistic diagnostic performance of advanced multimodal large language models (LLMs) in distinguishing these conditions using stepwise multimodal inputs. In this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, 50 patients with histopathologically confirmed malignancy or osteomyelitis of the maxilla or mandible were included. Three multimodal LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini) were assessed using standardized prompts in Korean and English under three imaging conditions: panoramic radiograph only (P), panoramic radiograph plus computed tomography (CT) (P + C), and panoramic radiograph plus CT plus histopathology slide (P + C+B). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated against histopathology as the reference standard using generalized linear mixed models. Overall diagnostic accuracy increased significantly with additional modalities, from 0.683 (95% CI, 0.542–0.797) under the P condition to 0.776 (95% CI, 0.652–0.865) under P + C, and to 0.978 (95% CI, 0.953–0.990) under P + C+B. Incorporation of histopathology slides markedly increased the odds of a correct diagnosis compared with P and P + C conditions (both p < 0.0001), while CT addition alone showed a nonsignificant trend toward improvement. Under limited imaging conditions, models tended to overdiagnose malignancy, reflecting high sensitivity but low specificity. With full multimodal input, all models achieved balanced diagnostic performance across models and languages. Notably, ChatGPT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy in the Korean-language condition than in English. Overall, these findings suggest that multimodal LLMs may support diagnostic interpretation by integrating heterogeneous imaging information, highlighting their potential role as adjunctive decision-support tools within existing maxillofacial diagnostic frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08454-9
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bi-linguistic performance of large language models in multimodal analysis for differentiating jawbone-destroying malignancy from osteomyelitis

Han-Gyeol Yeom, Hun Jun Lim, Jae Hyun Kang, Bong Chul Kim et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Bi-linguistic performance of large language models in multimodal analysis for differentiating jawbone-destroying malignancy from osteomyelitis

Han-Gyeol Yeom, Hun Jun Lim, Jae Hyun Kang, Bong Chul Kim, Suk Min Yoon, Jeong Hun Yoo
article en

Abstract

Differentiating jawbone-destroying malignancy from osteomyelitis remains a major diagnostic challenge in oral and maxillofacial surgery because these entities share overlapping radiologic features but require fundamentally different management strategies. This study evaluated the bi-linguistic diagnostic performance of advanced multimodal large language models (LLMs) in distinguishing these conditions using stepwise multimodal inputs. In this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, 50 patients with histopathologically confirmed malignancy or osteomyelitis of the maxilla or mandible were included. Three multimodal LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini) were assessed using standardized prompts in Korean and English under three imaging conditions: panoramic radiograph only (P), panoramic radiograph plus computed tomography (CT) (P + C), and panoramic radiograph plus CT plus histopathology slide (P + C+B). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated against histopathology as the reference standard using generalized linear mixed models. Overall diagnostic accuracy increased significantly with additional modalities, from 0.683 (95% CI, 0.542–0.797) under the P condition to 0.776 (95% CI, 0.652–0.865) under P + C, and to 0.978 (95% CI, 0.953–0.990) under P + C+B. Incorporation of histopathology slides markedly increased the odds of a correct diagnosis compared with P and P + C conditions (both p < 0.0001), while CT addition alone showed a nonsignificant trend toward improvement. Under limited imaging conditions, models tended to overdiagnose malignancy, reflecting high sensitivity but low specificity. With full multimodal input, all models achieved balanced diagnostic performance across models and languages. Notably, ChatGPT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy in the Korean-language condition than in English. Overall, these findings suggest that multimodal LLMs may support diagnostic interpretation by integrating heterogeneous imaging information, highlighting their potential role as adjunctive decision-support tools within existing maxillofacial diagnostic frameworks.

BMC Oral Health
Daejeon University (KR), Wonkwang University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.