“Not a Story to Pass On”? An Analysis of How Studying “Beloved” By Toni Morrison Can Contribute Towards Decolonial Key Stage 5 English Literature Curricula.

This case study evaluates how studying Toni Morrison’s trauma-focused novel, Beloved, contributed towards decolonial pedagogy within a Key Stage 5 (KS5) English Literature curriculum. The research involved an A-Level English Literature class of nine students at a co-educational independent boarding school in northern England. During students’ study of Beloved, a Capabilities Approach (CA) was used to evaluate how their learning challenged epistemic injustices to instead cultivate students’ “epistemic democracy” (Anderson, E. 2012. “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions.” Social Epistemology 26:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211) within the classroom and their “epistemic contributions” (Fricker, M. 2015. “Epistemic Contribution as a Central Human Capability.” In The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice, edited by G. Hull, 73–89. London: Lexington Books) to decolonial criticality. Evaluation then considers how these contributed towards pedagogical “repair” (Walker, M. 2024. “Repair in Education Spaces.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 25:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2023.2297917). Data collection methods included participant observations and students’ written journals, classwork and focus groups. Thematic coding informed analysis. Findings identify that small steps towards decoloniality were achieved. Analysing Beloved illuminated the traumatic reality and legacy of slavery which sparked students’ critical engagement and “epistemic contributions” (Fricker, M. 2015. “Epistemic Contribution as a Central Human Capability.” In The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice, edited by G. Hull, 73–89. London: Lexington Books) both verbally and in writing. These reflected some “transformational learning,” which perhaps constituted some pedagogical “repair” (Walker Citation2024) of historical injustices. However, confronting racial issues in the classroom exposed some “testimonial” and “hermeneutical” injustice felt by participants (Fricker Citation2015). Findings may support educators developing decolonial pedagogy and curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2026.2659064
Primary Topic
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Not a Story to Pass On”? An Analysis of How Studying “Beloved” By Toni Morrison Can Contribute Towards Decolonial Key Stage 5 English Literature Curricula.

Caroline Powell
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
article

“Not a Story to Pass On”? An Analysis of How Studying “Beloved” By Toni Morrison Can Contribute Towards Decolonial Key Stage 5 English Literature Curricula.

Caroline Powell
article en

Abstract

This case study evaluates how studying Toni Morrison’s trauma-focused novel, Beloved, contributed towards decolonial pedagogy within a Key Stage 5 (KS5) English Literature curriculum. The research involved an A-Level English Literature class of nine students at a co-educational independent boarding school in northern England. During students’ study of Beloved, a Capabilities Approach (CA) was used to evaluate how their learning challenged epistemic injustices to instead cultivate students’ “epistemic democracy” (Anderson, E. 2012. “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions.” Social Epistemology 26:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211) within the classroom and their “epistemic contributions” (Fricker, M. 2015. “Epistemic Contribution as a Central Human Capability.” In The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice, edited by G. Hull, 73–89. London: Lexington Books) to decolonial criticality. Evaluation then considers how these contributed towards pedagogical “repair” (Walker, M. 2024. “Repair in Education Spaces.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 25:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2023.2297917). Data collection methods included participant observations and students’ written journals, classwork and focus groups. Thematic coding informed analysis. Findings identify that small steps towards decoloniality were achieved. Analysing Beloved illuminated the traumatic reality and legacy of slavery which sparked students’ critical engagement and “epistemic contributions” (Fricker, M. 2015. “Epistemic Contribution as a Central Human Capability.” In The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice, edited by G. Hull, 73–89. London: Lexington Books) both verbally and in writing. These reflected some “transformational learning,” which perhaps constituted some pedagogical “repair” (Walker Citation2024) of historical injustices. However, confronting racial issues in the classroom exposed some “testimonial” and “hermeneutical” injustice felt by participants (Fricker Citation2015). Findings may support educators developing decolonial pedagogy and curricula.

Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.