The Psychoecological Dimensions of Intergroup Conflict in the African Context

Anthropogenic climate change acts as a complex stressor contributing to political instability and conflict, particularly in vulnerable regions such as Africa. While political science has long explored links between environmental degradation and armed conflict, the psychological mechanisms remain underexamined. This paper introduces a “psychoecological” framework, emphasizing the interaction between psychological functioning and ecological conditions. Within this framework, psychoterratic emotions and processes such as identity threat, in-group bias, and resource competition can transform environmental concerns into conflict dynamics. Drawing on theories of intergroup conflict—including Social Identity Theory, Realistic Conflict Theory, and Terror Management Theory—we show how environmental insecurity reinforces in-group cohesion and fosters out-group hostility. Case studies from sub-Saharan Africa illustrate how climate variability intersects with ethnic, political, and historical fault lines. We also examine how climate change, psychological vulnerability, and migration interact under conditions of insecurity. Integrating psychological insights into climate-related defence and development strategies is crucial for resilience. The psychoecological lens highlights the human dimensions of climate change, urging interdisciplinary approaches to address its impacts on security and peace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Central and Eastern European African Studies
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12700/jceeas.2026.6.1.429
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Psychoecological Dimensions of Intergroup Conflict in the African Context

Regina Szegedi
Journal of Central and Eastern European African Studies
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

The Psychoecological Dimensions of Intergroup Conflict in the African Context

Regina Szegedi
article en

Abstract

Anthropogenic climate change acts as a complex stressor contributing to political instability and conflict, particularly in vulnerable regions such as Africa. While political science has long explored links between environmental degradation and armed conflict, the psychological mechanisms remain underexamined. This paper introduces a “psychoecological” framework, emphasizing the interaction between psychological functioning and ecological conditions. Within this framework, psychoterratic emotions and processes such as identity threat, in-group bias, and resource competition can transform environmental concerns into conflict dynamics. Drawing on theories of intergroup conflict—including Social Identity Theory, Realistic Conflict Theory, and Terror Management Theory—we show how environmental insecurity reinforces in-group cohesion and fosters out-group hostility. Case studies from sub-Saharan Africa illustrate how climate variability intersects with ethnic, political, and historical fault lines. We also examine how climate change, psychological vulnerability, and migration interact under conditions of insecurity. Integrating psychological insights into climate-related defence and development strategies is crucial for resilience. The psychoecological lens highlights the human dimensions of climate change, urging interdisciplinary approaches to address its impacts on security and peace.

Journal of Central and Eastern European African StudiesVol. 6(1)
University of Debrecen (HU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.