PROductivity Study of Presbyopia Elimination in gaRment workers (PROSPER II): a randomised trial on the productivity impact of providing near glasses to Indian garment factory workers

BACKGROUND: Correction for presbyopia, the world's most common cause of vision impairment, significantly improves productivity in agriculture and crafts. However, effects on productivity in manufacturing remain unstudied. METHODS: PROSPER II was an individually randomised, investigator-masked, controlled trial conducted in Karnataka, India. Eligible garment factory workers aged ≥35 years with presbyopia (better-eye near vision N6.3 or worse (Snellen 6/12), correctable to N4 (Snellen 6/7.5)) and not owning glasses were randomised (1:1) to intervention (immediate delivery of glasses suited to working distance) or control (identical glasses delivered at endline). The primary outcome was work productivity, defined as the hourly number of items completed, normalised to a factory target rate, over 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included glasses wear adherence, visual function, and ROI. RESULTS: Among 4990 potentially eligible workers, 3648 (73.1%) underwent eye examinations, and 682 (18.7%, mean age 41.0 years, 99.0% female) were enrolled and randomised (intervention: n=344, 50.4%; control: n=338, 49.6%). All participants completed 12-week observation. In panel regression models for the pre-specified primary analysis, intervention group assignment (difference=0.0325, 95% CI 0.006 to 0.060, p=0.017) was significantly associated with greater productivity. Compared with workers in the highest skill grade (A), those in the lowest grade (C) had significantly lower productivity (difference=-0.049, 95% CI -0.087 to -0.011, p=0.011). Glasses increased productivity in the intervention group relative to controls by 5.70% (95% CI 1.04% to 10.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Free near glasses confer a significant productivity benefit in this factory setting, and are substantially less costly than other successful interventions such as management training. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04629820.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328563
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROductivity Study of Presbyopia Elimination in gaRment workers (PROSPER II): a randomised trial on the productivity impact of providing near glasses to Indian garment factory workers

Lynne Lohfeld, Sonia Pant, Sahil Bagwe, Ving Fai Chan et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

PROductivity Study of Presbyopia Elimination in gaRment workers (PROSPER II): a randomised trial on the productivity impact of providing near glasses to Indian garment factory workers

Lynne Lohfeld, Sonia Pant, Sahil Bagwe, Ving Fai Chan, Nathan Congdon, Smit Gade, Anant Nyshadham, Lovemore Nyasha Sigwadhi, Ella R. Gudwin, Greame MacKenzie, Mapa Prabhath Piyasena, Winston D Prakash, Simranjeet Dhir, Michael Cooke, Sangeetha Esther, Sofía Calderón, Saumya Joshi, Mike Clarke, Achyuta Adhvaryu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Correction for presbyopia, the world's most common cause of vision impairment, significantly improves productivity in agriculture and crafts. However, effects on productivity in manufacturing remain unstudied. METHODS: PROSPER II was an individually randomised, investigator-masked, controlled trial conducted in Karnataka, India. Eligible garment factory workers aged ≥35 years with presbyopia (better-eye near vision N6.3 or worse (Snellen 6/12), correctable to N4 (Snellen 6/7.5)) and not owning glasses were randomised (1:1) to intervention (immediate delivery of glasses suited to working distance) or control (identical glasses delivered at endline). The primary outcome was work productivity, defined as the hourly number of items completed, normalised to a factory target rate, over 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included glasses wear adherence, visual function, and ROI. RESULTS: Among 4990 potentially eligible workers, 3648 (73.1%) underwent eye examinations, and 682 (18.7%, mean age 41.0 years, 99.0% female) were enrolled and randomised (intervention: n=344, 50.4%; control: n=338, 49.6%). All participants completed 12-week observation. In panel regression models for the pre-specified primary analysis, intervention group assignment (difference=0.0325, 95% CI 0.006 to 0.060, p=0.017) was significantly associated with greater productivity. Compared with workers in the highest skill grade (A), those in the lowest grade (C) had significantly lower productivity (difference=-0.049, 95% CI -0.087 to -0.011, p=0.011). Glasses increased productivity in the intervention group relative to controls by 5.70% (95% CI 1.04% to 10.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Free near glasses confer a significant productivity benefit in this factory setting, and are substantially less costly than other successful interventions such as management training. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04629820.

British Journal of Ophthalmology
Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom) (GB), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB), Goa University (IN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), University of Michigan (US), Global Strategy Group (US), L V Prasad Eye Institute (IN), Harvard University Press (US), Ross School (US), Global Policy Institute (US), Applied Visions (United States) (US), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.