Retention of orthodontic aligners with different gingival margin designs on three-dimensionally printed models representing varying degrees of marginal tissue recession

Objective: To evaluate the influence of three gingival margin aligner designs positioned on models with varying severities of marginal tissue recession. Methods: Nine models were obtained for each marginal tissue ressection class (Classes I, II, III, and IV). Control models had no anatomical alterations. For each model, three aligners of each gingival margin designs were fabricated (scalloped, scalloped extended, and straight). The aligners were placed on the models, and a hook was positioned in the buccal region at the level of the mandibular first molars. Pull-off tests were performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min, and the maximum dislodgement force (N) was recorded. Each aligner was removed 10 times, and the average value was obtained. Results: < 0.05). The Class III model (54.4 N) exhibited the second highest retention value, which was significantly different from the other models. There was no significant difference in retention among Class I (25.6 N), Class II (33.2 N), and control (26.8 N). Conclusions: Aligner retention increased with increasing severity of marginal tissue recession. Aligners with scalloped margins provided less retention than those with scalloped-extended and straight margins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod25.269
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retention of orthodontic aligners with different gingival margin designs on three-dimensionally printed models representing varying degrees of marginal tissue recession

João Batista Blessmann Weber, Ana Maria Spohr, Guilherme Picolli Bernd, Hélio Radke Bittencourt et al.
The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Retention of orthodontic aligners with different gingival margin designs on three-dimensionally printed models representing varying degrees of marginal tissue recession

João Batista Blessmann Weber, Ana Maria Spohr, Guilherme Picolli Bernd, Hélio Radke Bittencourt, Natália Angela Bortoli
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of three gingival margin aligner designs positioned on models with varying severities of marginal tissue recession. Methods: Nine models were obtained for each marginal tissue ressection class (Classes I, II, III, and IV). Control models had no anatomical alterations. For each model, three aligners of each gingival margin designs were fabricated (scalloped, scalloped extended, and straight). The aligners were placed on the models, and a hook was positioned in the buccal region at the level of the mandibular first molars. Pull-off tests were performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min, and the maximum dislodgement force (N) was recorded. Each aligner was removed 10 times, and the average value was obtained. Results: < 0.05). The Class III model (54.4 N) exhibited the second highest retention value, which was significantly different from the other models. There was no significant difference in retention among Class I (25.6 N), Class II (33.2 N), and control (26.8 N). Conclusions: Aligner retention increased with increasing severity of marginal tissue recession. Aligners with scalloped margins provided less retention than those with scalloped-extended and straight margins.

The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.