Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale: Development, Validity, and Reliability Study

INTRODUCTION: One of the obstacles to breastfeeding is the false beliefs in society about human milk and breastfeeding. RESEARCH AIM: The aim of this study is to develop the "Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale" and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: = 34). The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines, and a pilot test was conducted with 10 participants. RESULTS: The draft scale initially consisted of 32 items and was evaluated by experts. Following exploratory factor analysis, eight items with low factor loadings were removed, and content validity was supported using the Lawshe technique. The final 24-item scale demonstrated a structure with two factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 and a dominant first factor, with good internal consistency (α = .86). CONCLUSION: The Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale demonstrated acceptable validity evidence and good reliability, and may be used to assess beliefs related to breastfeeding myths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Lactation
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344261434720
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale: Development, Validity, and Reliability Study

Sinem GÜVEN DİNMEZ, Kafiye Eroğlu, Muge Coskun Yildirim, Zehra Gölbaşı
Journal of Human Lactation
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale: Development, Validity, and Reliability Study

Sinem GÜVEN DİNMEZ, Kafiye Eroğlu, Muge Coskun Yildirim, Zehra Gölbaşı
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: One of the obstacles to breastfeeding is the false beliefs in society about human milk and breastfeeding. RESEARCH AIM: The aim of this study is to develop the "Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale" and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: = 34). The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines, and a pilot test was conducted with 10 participants. RESULTS: The draft scale initially consisted of 32 items and was evaluated by experts. Following exploratory factor analysis, eight items with low factor loadings were removed, and content validity was supported using the Lawshe technique. The final 24-item scale demonstrated a structure with two factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 and a dominant first factor, with good internal consistency (α = .86). CONCLUSION: The Human Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Scale demonstrated acceptable validity evidence and good reliability, and may be used to assess beliefs related to breastfeeding myths.

Journal of Human Lactation
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Hastanesi (TR), Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi (TR), Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR), Mudanya Üniversitesi
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.