Attitudes, Practices, and Barriers to Spiritual Care for Patients With Cancer: An International Survey

PURPOSE: Spiritual care is recognized by the WHO and consensus frameworks as integral to whole-person oncology care, yet its integration into practice remains limited. Global data on clinician beliefs, practices, and barriers are limited. The aim was to characterize oncology and palliative care clinicians' attitudes, practices, and barriers regarding spiritual care and to examine variation by characteristics such as role, region, age, sex, years of experience, setting, and place of clinical practice. METHODS: This was an international cross-sectional online survey (December 23, 2024-February 7, 2025) disseminated through oncology, hematology, and palliative care societies across 55 countries. Eligible participants were health care professionals involved in cancer care (N = 670). Attitudes toward spiritual care, perceived role, frequency of screening and history-taking, preparedness and training, and barriers were examined. Logistic regression models examined associations by discipline and region. RESULTS: Among 670 respondents (mean age, 47.8 years; 432 [64%] women), 380 (57%) practiced in Europe, and 228 (34%) in North America. Most endorsed spiritual care as essential (587 [90%]) and agreed that spiritual distress impairs outcomes (599 [92%]). Yet, only 87 (13%) always conducted screening and 56 (9%) always took a history. Nearly half of oncologists never did either. Compared with palliative care physicians, oncologists had lower odds of endorsing spiritual care as their role (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.59]) and performing screening (aOR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.95]). Training preparedness was lowest among oncologists (mean, 2.7/10) although 86% sought further training. Key barriers were the lack of time (49%) and role ambiguity (46%). CONCLUSION: Clinicians worldwide affirm the importance of spiritual care, yet systematic provision is limited. Embedding role-appropriate competencies and integrating screening into routine workflows are needed to advance whole-person cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op-25-01129
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes, Practices, and Barriers to Spiritual Care for Patients With Cancer: An International Survey

Andrea Antonuzzo, Christina M. Puchalski, Junita Henry, Tracy Anne Balboni et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Attitudes, Practices, and Barriers to Spiritual Care for Patients With Cancer: An International Survey

Andrea Antonuzzo, Christina M. Puchalski, Junita Henry, Tracy Anne Balboni, Carlotta Tagliaferro, Maura Dowling, Katherine Ast, Carla Ida Ripamonti, Joana Marinho, Marco Ladetto, Heather Coats, Alessandra Fabi, Florian Scotte’
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spiritual care is recognized by the WHO and consensus frameworks as integral to whole-person oncology care, yet its integration into practice remains limited. Global data on clinician beliefs, practices, and barriers are limited. The aim was to characterize oncology and palliative care clinicians' attitudes, practices, and barriers regarding spiritual care and to examine variation by characteristics such as role, region, age, sex, years of experience, setting, and place of clinical practice. METHODS: This was an international cross-sectional online survey (December 23, 2024-February 7, 2025) disseminated through oncology, hematology, and palliative care societies across 55 countries. Eligible participants were health care professionals involved in cancer care (N = 670). Attitudes toward spiritual care, perceived role, frequency of screening and history-taking, preparedness and training, and barriers were examined. Logistic regression models examined associations by discipline and region. RESULTS: Among 670 respondents (mean age, 47.8 years; 432 [64%] women), 380 (57%) practiced in Europe, and 228 (34%) in North America. Most endorsed spiritual care as essential (587 [90%]) and agreed that spiritual distress impairs outcomes (599 [92%]). Yet, only 87 (13%) always conducted screening and 56 (9%) always took a history. Nearly half of oncologists never did either. Compared with palliative care physicians, oncologists had lower odds of endorsing spiritual care as their role (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.59]) and performing screening (aOR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.95]). Training preparedness was lowest among oncologists (mean, 2.7/10) although 86% sought further training. Key barriers were the lack of time (49%) and role ambiguity (46%). CONCLUSION: Clinicians worldwide affirm the importance of spiritual care, yet systematic provision is limited. Embedding role-appropriate competencies and integrating screening into routine workflows are needed to advance whole-person cancer care.

JCO Oncology Practice
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), George Washington University (US), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (US), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Cancer Support Community (US), European Society for Paediatric Oncology (BE), Hospice and Palliative Nurses Foundation (US), Associazione Italiana Di Oncologia Medica (IT), Fondazione Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi Onlus (IT), Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (IT), Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia (PT), Center for Cancer Research (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Florence (IT), University of Brescia (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.