Physical Restraints and Seclusion in Psychiatric Settings in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review of the Perspectives of Nurses and Individuals with Mental Illness

Background/Objectives: Physical restraints and seclusion remain ethically contested interventions in psychiatric care, raising significant concerns regarding patient safety, dignity, and therapeutic impact. Despite growing international momentum towards restraint-reduction strategies, their use persists across the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), an area that has been the subject of limited systematic attention. This review synthesises evidence on the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of nurses and individuals with mental illness regarding these practices in EMR psychiatric settings. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42023383751), we systematically searched nine electronic databases for studies published up to June 2023, supplemented by backward and forward citation searching. Multiple reviewers independently screened records against predefined eligibility criteria, with disagreements resolved through consensus. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools, and reporting quality was evaluated using an adapted CROSS checklist; these two appraisal dimensions were conducted and reported independently. Findings were integrated through narrative synthesis. Results: From 4634 identified records, 19 studies conducted across 11 EMR countries met the inclusion criteria. Nursing knowledge deficits were identified across multiple settings, and attitudes towards restraint practices were predominantly negative. Individuals with mental illness consistently described restraint as humiliating, punitive, and physically distressing. Recurrent challenges identified across studies included inadequate staff training, chronic understaffing, and limited access to restraint-reduction alternatives. Conclusions: Substantial gaps in nursing knowledge and training persist across the EMR. The findings of this review, while derived predominantly from cross-sectional studies with convenience samples, suggest that evidence-based education programmes, standardised restraint-reduction policies, and patient-centred care frameworks warrant prioritisation to safeguard the rights, safety, and dignity of individuals with mental illness in this region. Longitudinal and experimental research is needed to confirm these directions and establish their effectiveness within EMR contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091161
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Restraints and Seclusion in Psychiatric Settings in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review of the Perspectives of Nurses and Individuals with Mental Illness

Karina Lovell, Antonia Marsden, Asrar Salem Almutairi, Owen Price et al.
Healthcare
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Physical Restraints and Seclusion in Psychiatric Settings in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review of the Perspectives of Nurses and Individuals with Mental Illness

Karina Lovell, Antonia Marsden, Asrar Salem Almutairi, Owen Price, Abdullah Hassan Alqahtani
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Physical restraints and seclusion remain ethically contested interventions in psychiatric care, raising significant concerns regarding patient safety, dignity, and therapeutic impact. Despite growing international momentum towards restraint-reduction strategies, their use persists across the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), an area that has been the subject of limited systematic attention. This review synthesises evidence on the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of nurses and individuals with mental illness regarding these practices in EMR psychiatric settings. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42023383751), we systematically searched nine electronic databases for studies published up to June 2023, supplemented by backward and forward citation searching. Multiple reviewers independently screened records against predefined eligibility criteria, with disagreements resolved through consensus. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools, and reporting quality was evaluated using an adapted CROSS checklist; these two appraisal dimensions were conducted and reported independently. Findings were integrated through narrative synthesis. Results: From 4634 identified records, 19 studies conducted across 11 EMR countries met the inclusion criteria. Nursing knowledge deficits were identified across multiple settings, and attitudes towards restraint practices were predominantly negative. Individuals with mental illness consistently described restraint as humiliating, punitive, and physically distressing. Recurrent challenges identified across studies included inadequate staff training, chronic understaffing, and limited access to restraint-reduction alternatives. Conclusions: Substantial gaps in nursing knowledge and training persist across the EMR. The findings of this review, while derived predominantly from cross-sectional studies with convenience samples, suggest that evidence-based education programmes, standardised restraint-reduction policies, and patient-centred care frameworks warrant prioritisation to safeguard the rights, safety, and dignity of individuals with mental illness in this region. Longitudinal and experimental research is needed to confirm these directions and establish their effectiveness within EMR contexts.

HealthcareVol. 14(9)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SA), University of Manchester (GB)
University of Manchester
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.