Optimising care for adults with learning disabilities with a diabetes diagnosis: a commentary

Purpose People with a learning disability are at a higher risk of developing diabetes than the general population. For them, and for those that care for them, a diagnosis of diabetes is associated with challenges. This paper explores the issues involved in optimising care for people with a learning disability to both prevent and manage diabetes in this population effectively and equitably. The paper is designed to inform clinical practice, improvements in patient care, and further research in this field. Design/Methodology/Approach A commentary which summarises and critically appraises a systematic review by Holden & Lee (2022) that examined the barriers and facilitators involved in optimal diabetes care for people with a learning disability. The commentary expands upon the review’s findings in the context of clinical practice. Findings The original systematic review identified twelve main barriers and fourteen main facilitators to optimal diabetes care for people with a learning disability at different individual, relationship, community and societal levels. Originality The authors of this commentary argue that strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration, providing education, reasonable adjustments, tailored interventions and improved communications, enhances self-management and ensures the optimisation of person-centred, equitable diabetes care for people with a learning disability across all healthcare practice settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CLOK (University of Central Lancashire)
Published
2026-04-20
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising care for adults with learning disabilities with a diabetes diagnosis: a commentary

A M Doherty, Emma Hodgson, Joanna Harrison, Lisa Robson
CLOK (University of Central Lancashire)
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Optimising care for adults with learning disabilities with a diabetes diagnosis: a commentary

A M Doherty, Emma Hodgson, Joanna Harrison, Lisa Robson
article en

Abstract

Purpose People with a learning disability are at a higher risk of developing diabetes than the general population. For them, and for those that care for them, a diagnosis of diabetes is associated with challenges. This paper explores the issues involved in optimising care for people with a learning disability to both prevent and manage diabetes in this population effectively and equitably. The paper is designed to inform clinical practice, improvements in patient care, and further research in this field. Design/Methodology/Approach A commentary which summarises and critically appraises a systematic review by Holden & Lee (2022) that examined the barriers and facilitators involved in optimal diabetes care for people with a learning disability. The commentary expands upon the review’s findings in the context of clinical practice. Findings The original systematic review identified twelve main barriers and fourteen main facilitators to optimal diabetes care for people with a learning disability at different individual, relationship, community and societal levels. Originality The authors of this commentary argue that strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration, providing education, reasonable adjustments, tailored interventions and improved communications, enhances self-management and ensures the optimisation of person-centred, equitable diabetes care for people with a learning disability across all healthcare practice settings.

CLOK (University of Central Lancashire)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.