Understanding the influence of soil moisture on machine learning predictions of photosynthesis and evapotranspiration

Evapotranspiration (ET) and photosynthesis are key processes in ecosystem functioning on which soil moisture (SM) has an important influence. Eddy covariance measurements and machine learning (ML) increasingly enable flux prediction in ungauged regions. With numerous SM estimation methods available, each representing different spatiotemporal scales, understanding how data choice influences ML predictions is important. Our study examines how different SM data affect ML predictions of ET and photosynthesis. At semi-arid to arid sites, we found that in-situ near-surface SM enhances ML predictions of ET. For photosynthesis, SM memory, indicative of deeper SM control, shows the highest predictive power, improving predictions by up to 30% at the driest sites. These contrasting responses reveal that ET and GPP are likely governed by distinct SM mechanisms: spatial scale matching for ET and temporal depth for GPP. Our study demonstrates that process-guided feature engineering can improve ML predictions where root-zone SM observations are often unavailable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Explore Bristol Research
Published
2026-04-22
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the influence of soil moisture on machine learning predictions of photosynthesis and evapotranspiration

Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha, Daniel Power, David McJannet, Rafael Rosolem et al.
Explore Bristol Research
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Understanding the influence of soil moisture on machine learning predictions of photosynthesis and evapotranspiration

Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha, Daniel Power, David McJannet, Rafael Rosolem, Pierre Gentine, Corinna Rebmann, Miguel A Rico-Ramirez, Martin Schrön
article en

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) and photosynthesis are key processes in ecosystem functioning on which soil moisture (SM) has an important influence. Eddy covariance measurements and machine learning (ML) increasingly enable flux prediction in ungauged regions. With numerous SM estimation methods available, each representing different spatiotemporal scales, understanding how data choice influences ML predictions is important. Our study examines how different SM data affect ML predictions of ET and photosynthesis. At semi-arid to arid sites, we found that in-situ near-surface SM enhances ML predictions of ET. For photosynthesis, SM memory, indicative of deeper SM control, shows the highest predictive power, improving predictions by up to 30% at the driest sites. These contrasting responses reveal that ET and GPP are likely governed by distinct SM mechanisms: spatial scale matching for ET and temporal depth for GPP. Our study demonstrates that process-guided feature engineering can improve ML predictions where root-zone SM observations are often unavailable.

Explore Bristol Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the influence of soil moisture on machine learning predictions of photosynthesis and evapotranspiration — Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha, Daniel Power, et al. · Explore Bristol Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS