Assembling social enterprise: How and why social movements become part of the state apparatus

This article explores how and why revolutionary social movements eventually become part of the state apparatus. Centring upon the case of the historical evolution of Scotland’s social enterprise ecosystem using the lens of assemblage thinking, we reframe the ecosystem as a shifting configuration of actors, values, organisations, and policies shaping desire for social change. Movement is traced from a nomadic, oppositional assemblage to a statist assemblage embedded in governmental inclusive growth agendas. We demonstrate how heterogeneous coalitions and policy instruments redefine what counts as social enterprise, with consequences for power, democratic accountability, and public value. The article advances public management scholarship by moving beyond ecosystem metaphors and by problematising a structural tension between the values of social movements: in our case autonomy and collective self-help, and democratic commitments to openness and inclusivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2026-04-22
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assembling social enterprise: How and why social movements become part of the state apparatus

Maeve Curtin, Michael J. Roy, Simon Teasdale, Christopher; id_orcid 0000-0003-0972-8906 Baird
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Assembling social enterprise: How and why social movements become part of the state apparatus

Maeve Curtin, Michael J. Roy, Simon Teasdale, Christopher; id_orcid 0000-0003-0972-8906 Baird
article en

Abstract

This article explores how and why revolutionary social movements eventually become part of the state apparatus. Centring upon the case of the historical evolution of Scotland’s social enterprise ecosystem using the lens of assemblage thinking, we reframe the ecosystem as a shifting configuration of actors, values, organisations, and policies shaping desire for social change. Movement is traced from a nomadic, oppositional assemblage to a statist assemblage embedded in governmental inclusive growth agendas. We demonstrate how heterogeneous coalitions and policy instruments redefine what counts as social enterprise, with consequences for power, democratic accountability, and public value. The article advances public management scholarship by moving beyond ecosystem metaphors and by problematising a structural tension between the values of social movements: in our case autonomy and collective self-help, and democratic commitments to openness and inclusivity.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
University of Stirling (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.