THEORY OF EVERYTHING AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Abed Peerally's equation TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Abed Peerally’s Theory of Everything (TOE) = Philosophy of Everything (PHIOE) + Physics of Everything (PHYOE): Toward Its Elucidation, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The analyzed work proposes that a genuine Theory of Everything cannot be reduced to physics alone, but must integrate a Philosophy of Everything and a Physics of Everything. From the perspective of the Theory of Objectivity, this study examines Peerally’s proposal through the modal discipline of TO, especially its Seven Absolute Truths, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, cosmogonic theorem, cosmological Eras, and the thesis that the transcendent element is knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article identifies significant points of compatibility between Peerally’s project and TO, especially the critique of physical-mechanistic reductionism, the centrality of the origin of the universe, the relevance of consciousness, and the need to overcome a purely mechanical conception of reality. At the same time, it highlights points of tension, particularly regarding the possible tendency toward idealism, theological metaphysics, or the attribution of foundational status to consciousness without modal formalization. The analysis argues that Peerally’s equation — TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE — can be fruitfully reinterpreted within the Theory of Objectivity as the need for a modal ontology of totality, articulated through phenomenic physics and informational transcendence. The article concludes that Peerally’s work has strong dialogical potential with TO, receiving a dialogical score of 7.5/10. Authors’ note: This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Everything; Philosophy of Everything; Physics of Everything; Abed Peerally; Theory of Objectivity; TO; modal ontology; modal discipline; phenomenic elements; Inductive Effects; origin of the universe; consciousness; observer; creation from nothing; transcendent information; atomic radiation; cosmology; philosophy of physics; critical–propositional analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19794674
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THEORY OF EVERYTHING AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Abed Peerally's equation TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Education and Society
article

THEORY OF EVERYTHING AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Abed Peerally's equation TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Abed Peerally’s Theory of Everything (TOE) = Philosophy of Everything (PHIOE) + Physics of Everything (PHYOE): Toward Its Elucidation, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The analyzed work proposes that a genuine Theory of Everything cannot be reduced to physics alone, but must integrate a Philosophy of Everything and a Physics of Everything. From the perspective of the Theory of Objectivity, this study examines Peerally’s proposal through the modal discipline of TO, especially its Seven Absolute Truths, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, cosmogonic theorem, cosmological Eras, and the thesis that the transcendent element is knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article identifies significant points of compatibility between Peerally’s project and TO, especially the critique of physical-mechanistic reductionism, the centrality of the origin of the universe, the relevance of consciousness, and the need to overcome a purely mechanical conception of reality. At the same time, it highlights points of tension, particularly regarding the possible tendency toward idealism, theological metaphysics, or the attribution of foundational status to consciousness without modal formalization. The analysis argues that Peerally’s equation — TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE — can be fruitfully reinterpreted within the Theory of Objectivity as the need for a modal ontology of totality, articulated through phenomenic physics and informational transcendence. The article concludes that Peerally’s work has strong dialogical potential with TO, receiving a dialogical score of 7.5/10. Authors’ note: This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Everything; Philosophy of Everything; Physics of Everything; Abed Peerally; Theory of Objectivity; TO; modal ontology; modal discipline; phenomenic elements; Inductive Effects; origin of the universe; consciousness; observer; creation from nothing; transcendent information; atomic radiation; cosmology; philosophy of physics; critical–propositional analysis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.