In Vivo Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Determining the Pressure Gradient for Multi-segmental Femoropopliteal Disease

PURPOSE: In peripheral arterial disease, the presence of multi-segmental (adjacent) stenotic lesions is common. The application of anatomic grading and duplex ultrasound for defining the significance of multi-segmental lesions is limited. This study aimed to validate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for estimating the pressure gradient in patients with multi-segmental femoropopliteal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients scheduled for angiography with multiple lesions in the femoropopliteal artery were prospectively enrolled. Pressures were recorded in rest and after papaverine administration using sheath and pressure-wire measurements. The resting pressure gradient of the full segment and the fractional flow reserve (FFR) of the full segment and individual lesions were calculated. These metrics were noninvasively replicated by CTA-based CFD using a reference flow rate (CFDm) and a duplex ultrasound-derived flow rate (CFDi). The agreement and diagnostic accuracy of CFD for identifying hemodynamic significance was assessed. RESULTS: CFDm underestimated the pressure gradient by - 4.0 ± 6.2 mmHg (mean ± SD). CFDi closely approximated the measured gradient with a 0.1 ± 3.1 mmHg difference. The full-segment FFR had a - 0.02 ± 0.06 difference and the individual-lesion FFR had a 0.01 ± 0.06 difference relative to the measured FFR. The diagnostic accuracy of CFD for the resting pressure gradient was 73% (CFDi) and 80% (CFDm). CFD demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 89% for full-vessel FFR and 83% for individual-lesion FFR. CONCLUSION: The results provide proof-of-concept validation for the use of CFD for noninvasive assessment of multi-segmental femoropopliteal disease. This could guide the treatment plan of multi-segmental PAD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b, Individual case-control study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-026-04427-1
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vivo Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Determining the Pressure Gradient for Multi-segmental Femoropopliteal Disease

Lennart van de Velde, P. Černohorský, M.M.P.J. Reijnen, M. Versluis et al.
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

In Vivo Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Determining the Pressure Gradient for Multi-segmental Femoropopliteal Disease

Lennart van de Velde, P. Černohorský, M.M.P.J. Reijnen, M. Versluis, E. Groot Jebbink, M. van Werkum, L. Rutten
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: In peripheral arterial disease, the presence of multi-segmental (adjacent) stenotic lesions is common. The application of anatomic grading and duplex ultrasound for defining the significance of multi-segmental lesions is limited. This study aimed to validate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for estimating the pressure gradient in patients with multi-segmental femoropopliteal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients scheduled for angiography with multiple lesions in the femoropopliteal artery were prospectively enrolled. Pressures were recorded in rest and after papaverine administration using sheath and pressure-wire measurements. The resting pressure gradient of the full segment and the fractional flow reserve (FFR) of the full segment and individual lesions were calculated. These metrics were noninvasively replicated by CTA-based CFD using a reference flow rate (CFDm) and a duplex ultrasound-derived flow rate (CFDi). The agreement and diagnostic accuracy of CFD for identifying hemodynamic significance was assessed. RESULTS: CFDm underestimated the pressure gradient by - 4.0 ± 6.2 mmHg (mean ± SD). CFDi closely approximated the measured gradient with a 0.1 ± 3.1 mmHg difference. The full-segment FFR had a - 0.02 ± 0.06 difference and the individual-lesion FFR had a 0.01 ± 0.06 difference relative to the measured FFR. The diagnostic accuracy of CFD for the resting pressure gradient was 73% (CFDi) and 80% (CFDm). CFD demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 89% for full-vessel FFR and 83% for individual-lesion FFR. CONCLUSION: The results provide proof-of-concept validation for the use of CFD for noninvasive assessment of multi-segmental femoropopliteal disease. This could guide the treatment plan of multi-segmental PAD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b, Individual case-control study.

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Rijnstate Hospital (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.