Resuscitation needs justice: an intersectional view on justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion

Disparities in cardiac arrest survival persist across gender, race, age, disability, socioeconomic status, and geographical location in part due to unequal access to life-saving interventions such as bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation. Inequities in access to training, equipment, and local implementation may reinforce these disparities across the chain of survival. Current diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) approaches to disparities in resuscitation research often examine inequities in isolation, limiting their ability to explain how structural, social, and institutional factors interact to influence outcomes. To address these limitations, this concept paper proposes examining the chain of survival through an intersectional lens, which considers Justice at the forefront of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI). Adding justice as an ethical principle aims to target these broader factors, and when combined with DEI efforts, may lead to a more comprehensive approach on examining inequities in resuscitation. Within the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), this intersectional JEDI lens provides a support for identifying inequities and barriers across both the chain of survival and the formula of survival, including medical science, educational efficiency, and local implementation, so that giving and receiving high-quality resuscitation becomes realistically attainable for everyone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resuscitation Plus
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101347
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resuscitation needs justice: an intersectional view on justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion

J. Delchef, Jacqueline Eleonora Ek, Şule Özbılgın, Sanin Bilić et al.
Resuscitation Plus
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Resuscitation needs justice: an intersectional view on justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion

J. Delchef, Jacqueline Eleonora Ek, Şule Özbılgın, Sanin Bilić, Cecilie Langkilde Lauesen, Robert Greif, Eve Kiebooms, Olfa Chakroun-Walha
article en

Abstract

Disparities in cardiac arrest survival persist across gender, race, age, disability, socioeconomic status, and geographical location in part due to unequal access to life-saving interventions such as bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation. Inequities in access to training, equipment, and local implementation may reinforce these disparities across the chain of survival. Current diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) approaches to disparities in resuscitation research often examine inequities in isolation, limiting their ability to explain how structural, social, and institutional factors interact to influence outcomes. To address these limitations, this concept paper proposes examining the chain of survival through an intersectional lens, which considers Justice at the forefront of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI). Adding justice as an ethical principle aims to target these broader factors, and when combined with DEI efforts, may lead to a more comprehensive approach on examining inequities in resuscitation. Within the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), this intersectional JEDI lens provides a support for identifying inequities and barriers across both the chain of survival and the formula of survival, including medical science, educational efficiency, and local implementation, so that giving and receiving high-quality resuscitation becomes realistically attainable for everyone.

Resuscitation PlusVol. 29
University of Bern (CH), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Mater Dei Hospital (MT), Belgian Road Research Centre (BE), Regional Hospital Randers (DK), Hopital Universitaire Habib Bourguiba (TN), International Burch University (BA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.