Implementing Diabetes Eating Problem Survey ‐ Revised in pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Clinician reflections on systematic screening and multidisciplinary management

AIM: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk of disordered eating; however, these symptoms may be underrecognized by clinicians. The aim of this study was to explore clinicians' perspectives and experiences on implementing the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) as a screening tool for disordered eating in a multidisciplinary care setting at a pediatric diabetes clinic. METHODS: A qualitative approach using Interpretive Description methodology was employed. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians, including pediatricians, nurses, dietitians, psychologists and psychiatrists. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified covering the relevance of DEPS-R as a supplement to the clinical expertise and intuition, enhancing conversations, interdisciplinary collaboration, engaging families and implementation challenges. Clinicians found DEPS-R valuable for detecting disordered eating, facilitating deeper patient conversations and supporting early intervention. Key challenges included time constraints and the need for further training. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians found DEPS-R to be a valuable addition to their practice for identifying disordered eating in youths with type 1 diabetes, but effective implementation requires interdisciplinary collaboration, management support and continuous optimization for clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetic Medicine
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70333
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing Diabetes Eating Problem Survey ‐ Revised in pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Clinician reflections on systematic screening and multidisciplinary management

Caroline Bruun Abild, Loa Clausen, Sigrid Bjerge Gribsholt, J P Knudsen et al.
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Implementing Diabetes Eating Problem Survey ‐ Revised in pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Clinician reflections on systematic screening and multidisciplinary management

Caroline Bruun Abild, Loa Clausen, Sigrid Bjerge Gribsholt, J P Knudsen, Melissa Schødt
article en

Abstract

AIM: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk of disordered eating; however, these symptoms may be underrecognized by clinicians. The aim of this study was to explore clinicians' perspectives and experiences on implementing the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) as a screening tool for disordered eating in a multidisciplinary care setting at a pediatric diabetes clinic. METHODS: A qualitative approach using Interpretive Description methodology was employed. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians, including pediatricians, nurses, dietitians, psychologists and psychiatrists. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified covering the relevance of DEPS-R as a supplement to the clinical expertise and intuition, enhancing conversations, interdisciplinary collaboration, engaging families and implementation challenges. Clinicians found DEPS-R valuable for detecting disordered eating, facilitating deeper patient conversations and supporting early intervention. Key challenges included time constraints and the need for further training. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians found DEPS-R to be a valuable addition to their practice for identifying disordered eating in youths with type 1 diabetes, but effective implementation requires interdisciplinary collaboration, management support and continuous optimization for clinical use.

Diabetic Medicine
Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.