Speech recognition performance disparities between Dutch diverse speaker groups

Current state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems recognize typical speech (very) well. However, recent research has shown that their performance degrades for "diverse" speech, i.e., speech that diverges from "typical" speech due to, among others, demographic and sociolinguistic factors. In this work, given the rapid development of ASR technologies, we examined the performance of nine recently released ASR systems developed by Google, Microsoft, Meta, NVIDIA, and OpenAI, and three custom ASR models trained from scratch, on Dutch diverse speech. Our results showed that although overall recognition results differ quite substantially between the different systems, all systems show similar patterns regarding recognition performance for diverse speaker groups: for most ASR systems and models, language proficiency differences and severe speech motor impairment had a greater impact on performance disparities between speaker groups than demographic or sociolinguistic factors, indicating that acoustic variability due to demographic and sociolinguistic factors is well-represented in "typical speech" training data and consequently is well-modeled in the models. Furthermore, we found that differences in data processing pipelines and decoding setups significantly influenced recognition performance. Importantly, updates to company-developed ASR systems do not always improve performance of or reduce performance disparities between diverse speaker groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phonetica
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2025-0061
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speech recognition performance disparities between Dutch diverse speaker groups

Odette Scharenborg, Yuanyuan Zhang, Thomas De Valck
Phonetica
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
article

Speech recognition performance disparities between Dutch diverse speaker groups

Odette Scharenborg, Yuanyuan Zhang, Thomas De Valck
article en

Abstract

Current state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems recognize typical speech (very) well. However, recent research has shown that their performance degrades for "diverse" speech, i.e., speech that diverges from "typical" speech due to, among others, demographic and sociolinguistic factors. In this work, given the rapid development of ASR technologies, we examined the performance of nine recently released ASR systems developed by Google, Microsoft, Meta, NVIDIA, and OpenAI, and three custom ASR models trained from scratch, on Dutch diverse speech. Our results showed that although overall recognition results differ quite substantially between the different systems, all systems show similar patterns regarding recognition performance for diverse speaker groups: for most ASR systems and models, language proficiency differences and severe speech motor impairment had a greater impact on performance disparities between speaker groups than demographic or sociolinguistic factors, indicating that acoustic variability due to demographic and sociolinguistic factors is well-represented in "typical speech" training data and consequently is well-modeled in the models. Furthermore, we found that differences in data processing pipelines and decoding setups significantly influenced recognition performance. Importantly, updates to company-developed ASR systems do not always improve performance of or reduce performance disparities between diverse speaker groups.

Phonetica
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Technische Universiteit Delft
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.