Stress shielding in sandwiches

Abstract Sandwiches are widely consumed, yet the mechanics of bread–filling interaction during biting remain unstudied. Texture mismatch can cause filling loss, high bite force, and poor eating experience. We developed a model system using toasted breads of varying firmness and fillings spanning a range of yield stresses, alongside common breads and fillings. Bread indentation hardness and filling apparent yield stress were quantified mechanically, and a custom bite rig simulated standardized bites to measure filling delivery, spillage, and peak bite force. From these data we defined a stress shielding ratio and a composite YUM Score capturing filling retention per unit bite force. Stiff breads paired with runny fillings performed worst, exhibiting high stress shielding, low delivery, and greater spillage, while well-matched bread–filling pairs achieved superior efficiency. Real sandwiches generally followed similar trends. These results show that minimizing stiffness mismatch, a core materials principle, improves sandwich performance and eating satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Food Engineering
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2026-0020
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress shielding in sandwiches

Alex Schudel, David M. Francis
International Journal of Food Engineering
Textile materials and evaluations
article

Stress shielding in sandwiches

Alex Schudel, David M. Francis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sandwiches are widely consumed, yet the mechanics of bread–filling interaction during biting remain unstudied. Texture mismatch can cause filling loss, high bite force, and poor eating experience. We developed a model system using toasted breads of varying firmness and fillings spanning a range of yield stresses, alongside common breads and fillings. Bread indentation hardness and filling apparent yield stress were quantified mechanically, and a custom bite rig simulated standardized bites to measure filling delivery, spillage, and peak bite force. From these data we defined a stress shielding ratio and a composite YUM Score capturing filling retention per unit bite force. Stiff breads paired with runny fillings performed worst, exhibiting high stress shielding, low delivery, and greater spillage, while well-matched bread–filling pairs achieved superior efficiency. Real sandwiches generally followed similar trends. These results show that minimizing stiffness mismatch, a core materials principle, improves sandwich performance and eating satisfaction.

International Journal of Food Engineering
United States Department of Justice (US), Office of Minority Health and Health Equity (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.