BRCA testing patterns in breast cancer over time in the United States: challenges and opportunities for improvement

Testing for germline mutations in breast cancer genes (g BRCA m) is recommended to inform treatment decisions for patients with breast cancer (BC); however, not all eligible patients will undergo testing. This targeted literature review summarizes evidence on real-world patterns of g BRCA m testing in BC in the United States (US) and misconceptions, beliefs, attitudes, or barriers related to g BRCA m testing. A total of 35 publications published up to September 2024 were included in the review, representing 32 unique studies. Since the early 2000’s, studies consistently reported increases in BRCA testing over time (7%-47% increase, with variations based on differing study designs, populations, and assessment periods). However, an unmet need for improved testing remains, particularly for eligible patients with hormone receptor-positive early BC. Barriers to testing reported by patients and physicians include lack of clear guidelines around g BRCA m testing eligibility, high costs, and inadequate insurance coverage. Additionally, patients with BC often reported limited knowledge regarding g BRCA m testing. Variable access to genetic counseling was reported by physicians as both a driver and a barrier to testing, and some physicians lack the expertise or confidence to discuss testing results with patients. Further evaluation on recent g BRCA m testing trends and barriers related to BRCA testing in the US is needed as the majority of studies identified in this literature review had data collection periods that occurred prior to 2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1797497
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BRCA testing patterns in breast cancer over time in the United States: challenges and opportunities for improvement

Deborah Tallarigo, Laura Moreno, Carolina Casañas i Comabella, Diane Rose et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

BRCA testing patterns in breast cancer over time in the United States: challenges and opportunities for improvement

Deborah Tallarigo, Laura Moreno, Carolina Casañas i Comabella, Diane Rose, Qixin Li, Erin Mandal, Kathryn Mishkin, Kelly E. McCann, Michael Byrnes
article en

Abstract

Testing for germline mutations in breast cancer genes (g BRCA m) is recommended to inform treatment decisions for patients with breast cancer (BC); however, not all eligible patients will undergo testing. This targeted literature review summarizes evidence on real-world patterns of g BRCA m testing in BC in the United States (US) and misconceptions, beliefs, attitudes, or barriers related to g BRCA m testing. A total of 35 publications published up to September 2024 were included in the review, representing 32 unique studies. Since the early 2000’s, studies consistently reported increases in BRCA testing over time (7%-47% increase, with variations based on differing study designs, populations, and assessment periods). However, an unmet need for improved testing remains, particularly for eligible patients with hormone receptor-positive early BC. Barriers to testing reported by patients and physicians include lack of clear guidelines around g BRCA m testing eligibility, high costs, and inadequate insurance coverage. Additionally, patients with BC often reported limited knowledge regarding g BRCA m testing. Variable access to genetic counseling was reported by physicians as both a driver and a barrier to testing, and some physicians lack the expertise or confidence to discuss testing results with patients. Further evaluation on recent g BRCA m testing trends and barriers related to BRCA testing in the US is needed as the majority of studies identified in this literature review had data collection periods that occurred prior to 2020.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), City of Hope (US), AstraZeneca (Brazil) (BR), Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States) (US), Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (US)
Merck
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.