<scp>GABA</scp> +‐Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Deep Learning Quality Assessment Framework

ABSTRACT Purpose Motivated by the need to improve GABA+‐edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) quality, we developed a three‐module framework to improve transient averaging based on quality. We hypothesized that training a deep learning (DL) model to differentiate spectrum quality could improve transient averaging compared to traditional averaging (simple arithmetic known as Equal‐weighting) and an existing software weighting algorithm (MSE‐weighting). Methods The transient averaging framework was approached through three modules: (1) a continuous‐valued automated quality labeling algorithm using both traditional and recently developed MRS quality metrics, (2) a dual‐domain (time and frequency) DL model that learns from these quality labels to assess quality scores for new data, and (3) a transient weighting algorithm informed by DL quality scores. The labeling algorithm was used to produce quality labels focused on retaining GABA+ peak shape in difference spectra (1) to train the DL model (2). The DL model quality scores were used to assign weights (3) for transient pairs within the final average difference spectrum. Results were compared to MSE‐weighting and Equal‐weighting. Results Retaining only GABA+‐edited transient pairs with positive quality labels resulted in improved spectral quality as assessed using traditional metrics, recently developed metrics and visual assessment of GABA+ and Glx peaks. Applying the trained DL model to in vivo scans improved the fit quality (lower fit error) compared to Equal‐weighting (4.759 ± 1.545 vs. 4.877 ± 1.762) and produced higher SNR compared to MSE‐weighting (18.758 ± 2.392 vs. 18.004 ± 2.68). Conclusion The framework as proposed can moderately improve data quality by optimizing transient averaging and provides opportunties for new work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70398
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GABA +‐Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Deep Learning Quality Assessment Framework

Roberto Souza, Ashley D. Harris, Hanna Bugler
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

GABA +‐Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Deep Learning Quality Assessment Framework

Roberto Souza, Ashley D. Harris, Hanna Bugler
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Motivated by the need to improve GABA+‐edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) quality, we developed a three‐module framework to improve transient averaging based on quality. We hypothesized that training a deep learning (DL) model to differentiate spectrum quality could improve transient averaging compared to traditional averaging (simple arithmetic known as Equal‐weighting) and an existing software weighting algorithm (MSE‐weighting). Methods The transient averaging framework was approached through three modules: (1) a continuous‐valued automated quality labeling algorithm using both traditional and recently developed MRS quality metrics, (2) a dual‐domain (time and frequency) DL model that learns from these quality labels to assess quality scores for new data, and (3) a transient weighting algorithm informed by DL quality scores. The labeling algorithm was used to produce quality labels focused on retaining GABA+ peak shape in difference spectra (1) to train the DL model (2). The DL model quality scores were used to assign weights (3) for transient pairs within the final average difference spectrum. Results were compared to MSE‐weighting and Equal‐weighting. Results Retaining only GABA+‐edited transient pairs with positive quality labels resulted in improved spectral quality as assessed using traditional metrics, recently developed metrics and visual assessment of GABA+ and Glx peaks. Applying the trained DL model to in vivo scans improved the fit quality (lower fit error) compared to Equal‐weighting (4.759 ± 1.545 vs. 4.877 ± 1.762) and produced higher SNR compared to MSE‐weighting (18.758 ± 2.392 vs. 18.004 ± 2.68). Conclusion The framework as proposed can moderately improve data quality by optimizing transient averaging and provides opportunties for new work.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
University of Calgary (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital (CA)
Alberta Student Aid, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chairs, Alberta Innovates, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.