CARE-HOUSE: developing a framework for conceptualizing social implications of digital health technologies in palliative care

The use of digital health technologies holds potential benefits for palliative care. Their implementation is fundamentally shifting routines and care practices. These shifts entail social implications that are complex, may emerge gradually and are challenging to identify. However, the social implications of digital health technologies are not conceptualized yet. This study addresses this gap by developing a framework on the social implications of digital technologies in palliative care, where the importance of social inclusion and interpersonal connection is particularly evident. We assessed the potential social implications of digital health technologies’ use in palliative care through a sequential research design using qualitative empirical methods of social research. Alongside conducting an iterative narrative literature review, we held multidisciplinary expert consultations using a conceptual mapping method and focus groups involving researchers, clinicians, and a patient and public involvement group, analyzed with qualitative structured content analysis. Participants as well as the literature review identified key areas to the understanding and analysis of the social implications of digital health technologies in palliative care: principles and objectives of palliative care (patient-centered care, Total care, multiprofessional collaboration, relieving suffering, improving quality of life); the various actors involved in a specific care practice; the different roles they might have; the interactions among different actors; the tasks individual actors might carry out; the processes they are involved in; and the contexts they are embedded in. These factors were summarized and set out in the CARE-HOUSE Framework to conceptualize the social implications of digital health technologies’ use in palliative care and to support researchers in assessing the impacts of these technologies. The CARE-HOUSE Framework provides guidance for analyzing the social implications of digital health technologies in palliative care. It will be for future studies to evaluate the framework’s adaptability and scalability to diverse technologies and settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02114-z
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CARE-HOUSE: developing a framework for conceptualizing social implications of digital health technologies in palliative care

Martin Vossiek, Eva Maria Hille, Peter Dabrock, Maria Heckel et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

CARE-HOUSE: developing a framework for conceptualizing social implications of digital health technologies in palliative care

Martin Vossiek, Eva Maria Hille, Peter Dabrock, Maria Heckel, Cynthia C. Forbes, Tobias Steigleder, Alina Weisser, Felix Mühlensiepen, Björn Eskofier, Christoph Ostgathe, Matthias Braun, Natalie Öhl, Alexander Kölpin
article en

Abstract

The use of digital health technologies holds potential benefits for palliative care. Their implementation is fundamentally shifting routines and care practices. These shifts entail social implications that are complex, may emerge gradually and are challenging to identify. However, the social implications of digital health technologies are not conceptualized yet. This study addresses this gap by developing a framework on the social implications of digital technologies in palliative care, where the importance of social inclusion and interpersonal connection is particularly evident. We assessed the potential social implications of digital health technologies’ use in palliative care through a sequential research design using qualitative empirical methods of social research. Alongside conducting an iterative narrative literature review, we held multidisciplinary expert consultations using a conceptual mapping method and focus groups involving researchers, clinicians, and a patient and public involvement group, analyzed with qualitative structured content analysis. Participants as well as the literature review identified key areas to the understanding and analysis of the social implications of digital health technologies in palliative care: principles and objectives of palliative care (patient-centered care, Total care, multiprofessional collaboration, relieving suffering, improving quality of life); the various actors involved in a specific care practice; the different roles they might have; the interactions among different actors; the tasks individual actors might carry out; the processes they are involved in; and the contexts they are embedded in. These factors were summarized and set out in the CARE-HOUSE Framework to conceptualize the social implications of digital health technologies’ use in palliative care and to support researchers in assessing the impacts of these technologies. The CARE-HOUSE Framework provides guidance for analyzing the social implications of digital health technologies in palliative care. It will be for future studies to evaluate the framework’s adaptability and scalability to diverse technologies and settings.

BMC Palliative CareVol. 25(1)
University of Bonn (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Hull (GB), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE), Hull York Medical School (GB), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.