Bones of contention: A reformative approach to deposits of cattle long bone splinters from Roman period sites

• Novel reformative definition of long bone splinter deposits as a distinct assemblage type. • First set of diagnostic criteria for the identification of long bone splinter deposits. • New insights into Roman cattle carcass processing practices. • Evidence from Roman settlements along the UNESCO World Heritage site “Danube Limes” and its hinterland. Diaphyseal fragments of cattle long bones frequently form conspicuous accumulations in Roman urban contexts. Despite their ubiquity, their interpretation remains contentious, ranging from by-products of marrow extraction and craft-related waste to construction material. This article defines and analyses Long Bone Splinter Deposits (BSD) from the Roman period sites Carnuntum, Ovilava, and Lauriacum. Traditionally overlooked or underestimated due to their fragmentary nature, these deposits are shown to represent structured accumulations resulting from standardized carcass processing sequences. Eight diagnostic criteria are developed, including species composition, skeletal element representation, surface modifications, fragment morphologies, and spatial context. The study argues that BSDs reflect specialized butchery and waste management practices, possibly linked to meat preservation, marrow extraction, or craft production. Their systematic documentation enhances our understanding of Roman food economies and urban infrastructure. BSDs offer therefore important insights into Roman provisioning systems, waste economies, and the organisation of animal-based production. Their consistent patterns across different sites underline the need for their systematic recording and interpretation as distinct assemblage types within zooarchaeological research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105778
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bones of contention: A reformative approach to deposits of cattle long bone splinters from Roman period sites

G.K. Kunst, N.I. Kirchengast
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Bones of contention: A reformative approach to deposits of cattle long bone splinters from Roman period sites

G.K. Kunst, N.I. Kirchengast
article en

Abstract

• Novel reformative definition of long bone splinter deposits as a distinct assemblage type. • First set of diagnostic criteria for the identification of long bone splinter deposits. • New insights into Roman cattle carcass processing practices. • Evidence from Roman settlements along the UNESCO World Heritage site “Danube Limes” and its hinterland. Diaphyseal fragments of cattle long bones frequently form conspicuous accumulations in Roman urban contexts. Despite their ubiquity, their interpretation remains contentious, ranging from by-products of marrow extraction and craft-related waste to construction material. This article defines and analyses Long Bone Splinter Deposits (BSD) from the Roman period sites Carnuntum, Ovilava, and Lauriacum. Traditionally overlooked or underestimated due to their fragmentary nature, these deposits are shown to represent structured accumulations resulting from standardized carcass processing sequences. Eight diagnostic criteria are developed, including species composition, skeletal element representation, surface modifications, fragment morphologies, and spatial context. The study argues that BSDs reflect specialized butchery and waste management practices, possibly linked to meat preservation, marrow extraction, or craft production. Their systematic documentation enhances our understanding of Roman food economies and urban infrastructure. BSDs offer therefore important insights into Roman provisioning systems, waste economies, and the organisation of animal-based production. Their consistent patterns across different sites underline the need for their systematic recording and interpretation as distinct assemblage types within zooarchaeological research.

Journal of Archaeological Science ReportsVol. 72
Institute of Human Sciences (AT), Austrian Archeological Institute (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.