Bridging practice and precision: a quantitative HER2 protein assay ready for clinical use in guiding trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy

Purpose Current daily usage of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) is guided by immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based HER2 assessment, with known inconsistency and inaccuracy to differentiating IHC 0 from 1 +. In this study, a quantitative HER2 assay based on the Quantitative Dot Blot (QDB) method was explored to fill this unmet need. Methods Consecutive resection specimens of HER2 IHC 0 and 1+ from invasive breast cancer patients were assigned to training (n=106) and validation cohorts ( n= 119), respectively by admission time. Protein lysates were extracted from 2x5 μm FFPE slices for HER2 quantification while the adjacent slice was used for IHC staining. Results QDB was demonstrated to be more consistent than IHC with an inter-rater Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.877 (95%CI: 0.840-0.908) vs. 0.513 (95%CI: 0.433-0.601). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed benchmarked with unanimous agreement of 18 pathologists in the training cohort to achieve an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9477 (p<0.005). A cutoff of 0.2746 nmole/g was also identified with its imprecision interval to stratify specimens into 0 (<C 5 ), equivocal (≥ C 5 & ≤ C 95 ) and 1+ (> C 95 ), with overall concordance of 90.9% and 87.3% when benchmarked with unanimous and consensus agreement (≥75%) of pathologists in the training cohort, and 92.0% and 90.5% when validated double-blinded with 12 pathologists in the validation cohort. More importantly, even among specimens unanimously categorized as IHC 0, there were ~15% specimens classified as 1+ by QDB. Conclusion Our results supports the QDB HER2 assay as an alternative option to guide T-DXd daily usage by distinguish Her2-low from Her2 0 while setting the stage for outcome-based patient stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1747961
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging practice and precision: a quantitative HER2 protein assay ready for clinical use in guiding trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy

Hai Hui Huang, Shasha Bi, Shukun Zhang, Qun Dai et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
article

Bridging practice and precision: a quantitative HER2 protein assay ready for clinical use in guiding trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy

Hai Hui Huang, Shasha Bi, Shukun Zhang, Qun Dai, Junmei Hao, Fangrong Tang, Xiaochun Fei, Nicole Salazar, Qinghua Cao, Jiahong Lyu, Chaofu Wang, Jiandi Zhang, Tong Liu, Tingting Wang, Xiaoqin Liu, Baohua Li, Fangfang Zou, Wenwei Jiang, Tingting Guo, Job Tien Chiang Liu, Lixia Li, Linlin Du, Yongcun Zhu, Xuanye Bai, Liya Yu, Weishan Chen, Xiaoqing Shao, Jingjing Liu, Yue Pan, Cuiping Zhang, Qian Hu, Xiaosong Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose Current daily usage of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) is guided by immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based HER2 assessment, with known inconsistency and inaccuracy to differentiating IHC 0 from 1 +. In this study, a quantitative HER2 assay based on the Quantitative Dot Blot (QDB) method was explored to fill this unmet need. Methods Consecutive resection specimens of HER2 IHC 0 and 1+ from invasive breast cancer patients were assigned to training (n=106) and validation cohorts ( n= 119), respectively by admission time. Protein lysates were extracted from 2x5 μm FFPE slices for HER2 quantification while the adjacent slice was used for IHC staining. Results QDB was demonstrated to be more consistent than IHC with an inter-rater Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.877 (95%CI: 0.840-0.908) vs. 0.513 (95%CI: 0.433-0.601). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed benchmarked with unanimous agreement of 18 pathologists in the training cohort to achieve an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9477 (p<0.005). A cutoff of 0.2746 nmole/g was also identified with its imprecision interval to stratify specimens into 0 (<C 5 ), equivocal (≥ C 5 & ≤ C 95 ) and 1+ (> C 95 ), with overall concordance of 90.9% and 87.3% when benchmarked with unanimous and consensus agreement (≥75%) of pathologists in the training cohort, and 92.0% and 90.5% when validated double-blinded with 12 pathologists in the validation cohort. More importantly, even among specimens unanimously categorized as IHC 0, there were ~15% specimens classified as 1+ by QDB. Conclusion Our results supports the QDB HER2 assay as an alternative option to guide T-DXd daily usage by distinguish Her2-low from Her2 0 while setting the stage for outcome-based patient stratification.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
North Carolina Central University (US), Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN), Xinjiang Medical University (CN), Shandong University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (CN), The 180th Hospital of PLA (CN), Weihai Municipal Hospital (CN), Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital (CN), Behavioral Diagnostics (United States) (US), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Third People's Hospital of Hefei (CN), Lu'an First People's Hospital (CN)
Binzhou Medical University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.