The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Formaldehyde and its releasers are common preservatives and potent sensitizers. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy and allergy to its five most common releasers among dermatitis patients. Two authors independently searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 30th September 2025. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. A total of 158 studies involving 1 347 638 dermatitis patients were included. The pooled prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy was 2.88% (95% CI 2.55-3.24) with clinical relevance at 41.57%. The pooled prevalence for releasers was 2.76% for 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, 1.89% for quaternium-15, 1.42% for diazolidinyl urea, 1.37% for DMDM hydantoin, and 1.20% for imidazolidinyl urea. Quaternium-15 showed the highest clinical relevance at 55.67%. Significant sensitization rates were observed in different geographic regions, with the highest prevalence found in North America (6.8%). The prevalence rate was 2.96% among children and 2.61% among adults, with no significant difference. The prevalence rate was 2.65% among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 2.85% among patients without AD, with no significant difference. The profound geographic disparities suggest that regulatory interventions, such as the EU's prohibition of formaldehyde and quaternium-15 in cosmetics, are highly effective public health measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contact Dermatitis
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.70172
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Mikkel Bak Jensen, Jeanne Duus Johansen, Daniel Isufi, Rebekka Søgaard et al.
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
article

The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Mikkel Bak Jensen, Jeanne Duus Johansen, Daniel Isufi, Rebekka Søgaard, Kian Karimian, Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen
article en

Abstract

Formaldehyde and its releasers are common preservatives and potent sensitizers. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy and allergy to its five most common releasers among dermatitis patients. Two authors independently searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 30th September 2025. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. A total of 158 studies involving 1 347 638 dermatitis patients were included. The pooled prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy was 2.88% (95% CI 2.55-3.24) with clinical relevance at 41.57%. The pooled prevalence for releasers was 2.76% for 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, 1.89% for quaternium-15, 1.42% for diazolidinyl urea, 1.37% for DMDM hydantoin, and 1.20% for imidazolidinyl urea. Quaternium-15 showed the highest clinical relevance at 55.67%. Significant sensitization rates were observed in different geographic regions, with the highest prevalence found in North America (6.8%). The prevalence rate was 2.96% among children and 2.61% among adults, with no significant difference. The prevalence rate was 2.65% among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 2.85% among patients without AD, with no significant difference. The profound geographic disparities suggest that regulatory interventions, such as the EU's prohibition of formaldehyde and quaternium-15 in cosmetics, are highly effective public health measures.

Contact Dermatitis
University of Copenhagen (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.