A Tutorial on Mechanistic Modeling of Nonstatistical Reactivity: Example of Light and Heat Effects in the Garratt–Braverman/[1,5]-H Shift of Ene-diallenes

Broad terms in the literature, such as nonstatistical reactivity or nontraditional luminescence, emerge when standard theories fail to explain experimental results. In the case of nonstatistical and dynamic effects, reaction rates and product ratios may vary wildly from transition state theory (TST) predictions and are commonly accompanied by a lack of temperature dependence. In this Tutorial, we explain how to use modern and freely available computational chemistry tools to model apparently nonstatistical reactions in relatively large organic molecules, using a concrete example of the thermal Garratt–Braverman/[1,5]-H shift of an ene-diallene, such that a non-expert can easily replicate our approach by following our steps. As a team of synthetic organic chemists and computational chemists, we aim to promote the use of preparatory computational work that can aid in reaction design during the experimental process rather than merely serving as complementary data to finished experimental studies. For this reason, we also offer an overview of the literature leading into more advanced computational techniques. Working through the example of the thermal Garratt–Braverman/[1,5]-H shift, we illustrate how theory and experiment can be used together to investigate the possibility of parallel light-enabled reactions and the role of tunneling effects and to perform careful variable temperature analysis when it becomes necessary. As the motifs of reactive π–π* absorptions, hydrogen transfers, and diradical intermediates are quite common, the points presented in this Tutorial are broadly applicable and indicative of the underlying complexity behind many chemical reactions that exhibit unexpected rates and ratios. The failure of TST also underscores a critical limitation of massive reaction network discovery schemes that heavily rely on calculated ground-state activation energies as well as the potential pitfalls of the conventional free energy diagram mindset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Physical Chemistry Au
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphyschemau.6c00003
Primary Topic
Cyclization and Aryne Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tutorial on Mechanistic Modeling of Nonstatistical Reactivity: Example of Light and Heat Effects in the Garratt–Braverman/[1,5]-H Shift of Ene-diallenes

C Tingskov Pedersen, Gemma C. Solomon, Tomislav Rožić, Lea K. Northcote et al.
ACS Physical Chemistry Au
Cyclization and Aryne Chemistry
article

A Tutorial on Mechanistic Modeling of Nonstatistical Reactivity: Example of Light and Heat Effects in the Garratt–Braverman/[1,5]-H Shift of Ene-diallenes

C Tingskov Pedersen, Gemma C. Solomon, Tomislav Rožić, Lea K. Northcote, Yuxuan Hou
article en

Abstract

Broad terms in the literature, such as nonstatistical reactivity or nontraditional luminescence, emerge when standard theories fail to explain experimental results. In the case of nonstatistical and dynamic effects, reaction rates and product ratios may vary wildly from transition state theory (TST) predictions and are commonly accompanied by a lack of temperature dependence. In this Tutorial, we explain how to use modern and freely available computational chemistry tools to model apparently nonstatistical reactions in relatively large organic molecules, using a concrete example of the thermal Garratt–Braverman/[1,5]-H shift of an ene-diallene, such that a non-expert can easily replicate our approach by following our steps. As a team of synthetic organic chemists and computational chemists, we aim to promote the use of preparatory computational work that can aid in reaction design during the experimental process rather than merely serving as complementary data to finished experimental studies. For this reason, we also offer an overview of the literature leading into more advanced computational techniques. Working through the example of the thermal Garratt–Braverman/[1,5]-H shift, we illustrate how theory and experiment can be used together to investigate the possibility of parallel light-enabled reactions and the role of tunneling effects and to perform careful variable temperature analysis when it becomes necessary. As the motifs of reactive π–π* absorptions, hydrogen transfers, and diradical intermediates are quite common, the points presented in this Tutorial are broadly applicable and indicative of the underlying complexity behind many chemical reactions that exhibit unexpected rates and ratios. The failure of TST also underscores a critical limitation of massive reaction network discovery schemes that heavily rely on calculated ground-state activation energies as well as the potential pitfalls of the conventional free energy diagram mindset.

ACS Physical Chemistry Au
University of Copenhagen (DK), Nano Hydrophobics (United States) (US), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
H2020 European Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cyclization and Aryne Chemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.