Development and Validation of AI System for Tooth Detection and Diagnosis in Dental Radiographs

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: To develop and validate an AI-automated system for dental charting that accounts for multiple radiograph types and younger patients. METHODS: A total of 3705 dental radiographs were collected in Slovakia and Egypt between 2023 and 2024, including orthopantomograms (OPGs) and intraoral radiographs (e.g. bitewings). Complete teeth were manually annotated with bounding boxes and tooth numbers by 2 calibrated annotators. Subsequently, teeth were assessed by at least 3 trained clinicians (10 total, 2-13 years of clinical experience) for the presence of ten dental findings (caries, crown, filling, implant, pontic, periapical lesion, primary tooth, retained root, root canal treatment, unerupted tooth). Assessments were aggregated using the Dawid-Skene model. The AI system comprised 3 deep learning stages for modality classification (OPG or intraoral radiograph; EfficientNetV2), tooth detection per modality (RTMDet), and dental finding classification (EfficientNetV2) and was evaluated with 5-fold cross-validation on 400 held-out radiographs against the clinicians and 3 independent dentists. RESULTS: Tooth detection was highly effective (F1-score: OPG = 0.99, intraoral = 0.98; tooth number accuracy: OPG = 0.98, intraoral = 0.96) with decreased effectiveness for primary teeth. Dental finding classification saw mixed effectiveness (F1-score: 0.52 to 0.99) with a lower effectiveness for disease-related findings. The system was more accurate than the dentists for caries, crowns, fillings, primary teeth, root canal treatments, and unerupted teeth. CONCLUSION: The AI system outperformed dentists for common findings, but more radiographs and annotations are required to effectively interpret rare conditions. Overall, it can support radiographic diagnosis and speed up dental charting for most patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Interpretation of dental radiographs requires clinical experience and remains challenging. An effective AI system was developed for tooth detection and diagnosis in several types of dental radiographs of young and adult patients. Its findings can enhance the clinical workflow, facilitate dentist-patient communication, and improve diagnostic consistency for prevalent findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109576
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of AI System for Tooth Detection and Diagnosis in Dental Radiographs

Wesley Do, Peter Jurkáček, Niels van Nistelrooij, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam et al.
International Dental Journal
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Development and Validation of AI System for Tooth Detection and Diagnosis in Dental Radiographs

Wesley Do, Peter Jurkáček, Niels van Nistelrooij, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Bas A.C. Loomans, Maximiliano Sergio Cenci, Khalid El Ghoul, Julian Runge, Tong Xi
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: To develop and validate an AI-automated system for dental charting that accounts for multiple radiograph types and younger patients. METHODS: A total of 3705 dental radiographs were collected in Slovakia and Egypt between 2023 and 2024, including orthopantomograms (OPGs) and intraoral radiographs (e.g. bitewings). Complete teeth were manually annotated with bounding boxes and tooth numbers by 2 calibrated annotators. Subsequently, teeth were assessed by at least 3 trained clinicians (10 total, 2-13 years of clinical experience) for the presence of ten dental findings (caries, crown, filling, implant, pontic, periapical lesion, primary tooth, retained root, root canal treatment, unerupted tooth). Assessments were aggregated using the Dawid-Skene model. The AI system comprised 3 deep learning stages for modality classification (OPG or intraoral radiograph; EfficientNetV2), tooth detection per modality (RTMDet), and dental finding classification (EfficientNetV2) and was evaluated with 5-fold cross-validation on 400 held-out radiographs against the clinicians and 3 independent dentists. RESULTS: Tooth detection was highly effective (F1-score: OPG = 0.99, intraoral = 0.98; tooth number accuracy: OPG = 0.98, intraoral = 0.96) with decreased effectiveness for primary teeth. Dental finding classification saw mixed effectiveness (F1-score: 0.52 to 0.99) with a lower effectiveness for disease-related findings. The system was more accurate than the dentists for caries, crowns, fillings, primary teeth, root canal treatments, and unerupted teeth. CONCLUSION: The AI system outperformed dentists for common findings, but more radiographs and annotations are required to effectively interpret rare conditions. Overall, it can support radiographic diagnosis and speed up dental charting for most patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Interpretation of dental radiographs requires clinical experience and remains challenging. An effective AI system was developed for tooth detection and diagnosis in several types of dental radiographs of young and adult patients. Its findings can enhance the clinical workflow, facilitate dentist-patient communication, and improve diagnostic consistency for prevalent findings.

International Dental JournalVol. 76(4)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Hospital Münster (DE), Ocná klinika (SK)
Agence de l'innovation de Défense
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.