Impact of the Oncologist's Recommendation on Exercise Levels and Quality of Life in Patients With Lung Cancer: The <scp>ORE</scp> Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Although physical activity is associated with improved survival in lung cancer, most patients remain inactive. This study examined the impact of an oncologist's recommendation on exercise quantity, sedentary behavior, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: In this single-blind, 3-arm randomized controlled trial, patients with lung cancer (stages I-IV) were assigned to: (1) usual care, (2) the oncologist's verbal and written exercise recommendation, or (3) the recommendation plus a printed exercise guidebook. Exercise, sedentary behaviors, and QoL were assessed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and a generalized linear regression model were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Overall, 91 patients (n = 31 recommendation group, n = 31 recommendation + guidebook group, n = 29 controls) were randomized. At 8 weeks, the recommendation group showed a significant increase in total (+270 min/week, p = 0.03) and light-intensity physical activity (+236 min/week, p = 0.01) versus controls. The recommendation plus guidebook group demonstrated a near-significant increase in total (+251 min/week, p = 0.05) and moderate-intensity physical activity (+145 min/week, p = 0.05). No significant changes were observed for sedentary behaviors. Regarding QoL, at 4 weeks, the recommendation plus guidebook group demonstrated an enhancement in cognitive function and the recommendation group in social function compared to controls. At 8 weeks, the recommendation + guidebook group reported improved constipation compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS: A brief oncologist-delivered recommendation effectively increased the total physical exercise in patients with lung cancer. Combining the oncologist's recommendation with a dedicated guidebook may be more effective in promoting moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise, although the short follow-up limits conclusions regarding long-term effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT05497544.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71857
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the Oncologist's Recommendation on Exercise Levels and Quality of Life in Patients With Lung Cancer: The ORE Randomized Controlled Trial

Ilaria Trestini, Sara Pilotto, Michèle Milella, Jessica Menis et al.
Cancer Medicine
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Impact of the Oncologist's Recommendation on Exercise Levels and Quality of Life in Patients With Lung Cancer: The ORE Randomized Controlled Trial

Ilaria Trestini, Sara Pilotto, Michèle Milella, Jessica Menis, Anita Borsati, Lorenzo Belluomini, Daniela Tregnago, Alice Avancini, Jessica Insolda, M. Sposito, Diana Giannarelli, Paolo Lavagnolo, Federico Schena
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although physical activity is associated with improved survival in lung cancer, most patients remain inactive. This study examined the impact of an oncologist's recommendation on exercise quantity, sedentary behavior, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: In this single-blind, 3-arm randomized controlled trial, patients with lung cancer (stages I-IV) were assigned to: (1) usual care, (2) the oncologist's verbal and written exercise recommendation, or (3) the recommendation plus a printed exercise guidebook. Exercise, sedentary behaviors, and QoL were assessed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and a generalized linear regression model were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Overall, 91 patients (n = 31 recommendation group, n = 31 recommendation + guidebook group, n = 29 controls) were randomized. At 8 weeks, the recommendation group showed a significant increase in total (+270 min/week, p = 0.03) and light-intensity physical activity (+236 min/week, p = 0.01) versus controls. The recommendation plus guidebook group demonstrated a near-significant increase in total (+251 min/week, p = 0.05) and moderate-intensity physical activity (+145 min/week, p = 0.05). No significant changes were observed for sedentary behaviors. Regarding QoL, at 4 weeks, the recommendation plus guidebook group demonstrated an enhancement in cognitive function and the recommendation group in social function compared to controls. At 8 weeks, the recommendation + guidebook group reported improved constipation compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS: A brief oncologist-delivered recommendation effectively increased the total physical exercise in patients with lung cancer. Combining the oncologist's recommendation with a dedicated guidebook may be more effective in promoting moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise, although the short follow-up limits conclusions regarding long-term effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT05497544.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(5)
University of Verona (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.