Explaining the Formulation of the San Francisco System: A Comparative and Eclectic Analysis of U.S. Bilateral Alliances in East Asia

Although the U.S. hub-and-spokes system was created during the Cold War to contain communism, it has remained resilient for over seven decades. This article examines the formulation of the San Francisco System (SFS) in East Asia, rather than its implementation or effectiveness. Existing scholarship often selects cases to fit specific theories, limiting explanatory power. As a result, the five main theories of alliance formation do not fully explain why alliances emerged in East Asia’s unique context. To address this gap, the article proposes analytical eclecticism instead of a single grand theory. It argues that alliance formation in asymmetric contexts is best understood as the interaction of multiple mechanisms rather than one dominant factor, offering a more comprehensive framework for analyzing the origins of the SFS and regional security architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47305/jlia.2026.2120
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining the Formulation of the San Francisco System: A Comparative and Eclectic Analysis of U.S. Bilateral Alliances in East Asia

Geetha Govindasamy, Kyu Hyun Jo, Thaha Albana Turmuzi
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Explaining the Formulation of the San Francisco System: A Comparative and Eclectic Analysis of U.S. Bilateral Alliances in East Asia

Geetha Govindasamy, Kyu Hyun Jo, Thaha Albana Turmuzi
article en

Abstract

Although the U.S. hub-and-spokes system was created during the Cold War to contain communism, it has remained resilient for over seven decades. This article examines the formulation of the San Francisco System (SFS) in East Asia, rather than its implementation or effectiveness. Existing scholarship often selects cases to fit specific theories, limiting explanatory power. As a result, the five main theories of alliance formation do not fully explain why alliances emerged in East Asia’s unique context. To address this gap, the article proposes analytical eclecticism instead of a single grand theory. It argues that alliance formation in asymmetric contexts is best understood as the interaction of multiple mechanisms rather than one dominant factor, offering a more comprehensive framework for analyzing the origins of the SFS and regional security architecture.

Journal of Liberty and International Affairs Institute for Research and European Studies - BitolaVol. 12(1)
University of Malaya (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.