Digital technologies in ethnobiology and ethnoecology: methodological opportunities, ethical challenges, and participatory implications

The increasing adoption of digital technologies has reshaped methodological practices in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Mobile data collection platforms, participatory mapping tools, biodiversity databases, remote sensing technologies, and digital analytical environments have expanded researchers' capacity to document, integrate, and analyze biocultural knowledge across spatial and temporal scales. At the same time, digitalization raises critical methodological and ethical questions related to participation, data governance, and the representation of local knowledge systems. This article presents a critical narrative review of digital technologies used in ethnobiological and ethnoecological research, moving beyond an instrumental focus on tools to examine their methodological, ethical, and participatory implications. Digital technologies are organized into six functional categories-structured data collection, participatory mapping, biodiversity cataloging, audio recording and transcription, remote sensing, and data analysis and visualization-used as analytical devices to synthesize recurrent patterns across the literature. The review examines how these technologies shape knowledge production, integration, and communication, with particular attention to their mediating role in relationships between researchers and Indigenous peoples and local communities. Across categories, the analysis highlights trade-offs related to participation, consent, data sovereignty, standardization, and contextual depth. By synthesizing opportunities and limitations documented in empirical and methodological studies, this review argues that the value of digital technologies in ethnobiology lies less in technological novelty than in their capacity to support reflexive, transparent, and ethically grounded research practices when embedded within community-centered governance frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-026-00889-2
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital technologies in ethnobiology and ethnoecology: methodological opportunities, ethical challenges, and participatory implications

Hudson Toscano Lopes Barroso da Silva
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Digital technologies in ethnobiology and ethnoecology: methodological opportunities, ethical challenges, and participatory implications

Hudson Toscano Lopes Barroso da Silva
article en

Abstract

The increasing adoption of digital technologies has reshaped methodological practices in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Mobile data collection platforms, participatory mapping tools, biodiversity databases, remote sensing technologies, and digital analytical environments have expanded researchers' capacity to document, integrate, and analyze biocultural knowledge across spatial and temporal scales. At the same time, digitalization raises critical methodological and ethical questions related to participation, data governance, and the representation of local knowledge systems. This article presents a critical narrative review of digital technologies used in ethnobiological and ethnoecological research, moving beyond an instrumental focus on tools to examine their methodological, ethical, and participatory implications. Digital technologies are organized into six functional categories-structured data collection, participatory mapping, biodiversity cataloging, audio recording and transcription, remote sensing, and data analysis and visualization-used as analytical devices to synthesize recurrent patterns across the literature. The review examines how these technologies shape knowledge production, integration, and communication, with particular attention to their mediating role in relationships between researchers and Indigenous peoples and local communities. Across categories, the analysis highlights trade-offs related to participation, consent, data sovereignty, standardization, and contextual depth. By synthesizing opportunities and limitations documented in empirical and methodological studies, this review argues that the value of digital technologies in ethnobiology lies less in technological novelty than in their capacity to support reflexive, transparent, and ethically grounded research practices when embedded within community-centered governance frameworks.

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.