Bootstrap Blackness: Black Men, Conservatism, and Party Politics

Abstract Ideological diversity has long characterized the Black community, yet this diversity has historically manifested as political homogeneity in electoral participation. While Black men vote for Democratic candidates at lower rates than Black women, they continue to support Democrats at higher rates than Latino, Asian, and white men and women. Despite their comparatively high turnout, Black men are frequently scapegoated for Democratic losses, even while the party has acknowledged Black women’s loyalty. We argue that Black men’s political leanings reflect a complex interplay of gendered, racial, and ideological forces, particularly their attitudes toward Black women, white men, and broader policy concerns. We also argue that, compared with Black women, Black men disproportionately use Black-led podcasts as counterpublics, spaces outside mainstream consciousness to discuss issues internal to the Black community. Using content analysis of Black male–hosted podcasts from 2014–2025 and data from the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS), we show that Black men’s Democratic party support, although not as strong as Black women’s, remains robust. We introduce the Black Patriarchy Index, which captures dimensions of hostile sexism, bootstrap racial uplift ideology, and rejection of intersectional solidarity. Our findings demonstrate that the modest but significant rise in conservatism among Black men relative to Black women can be partially explained by higher scores on this index, illustrating how Black men’s conservative attitudes shape political ideology and party loyalty within the Black electorate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2026.10063
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bootstrap Blackness: Black Men, Conservatism, and Party Politics

Christina Greer, Christine Slaughter, Chaya Y Crowder
The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Bootstrap Blackness: Black Men, Conservatism, and Party Politics

Christina Greer, Christine Slaughter, Chaya Y Crowder
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ideological diversity has long characterized the Black community, yet this diversity has historically manifested as political homogeneity in electoral participation. While Black men vote for Democratic candidates at lower rates than Black women, they continue to support Democrats at higher rates than Latino, Asian, and white men and women. Despite their comparatively high turnout, Black men are frequently scapegoated for Democratic losses, even while the party has acknowledged Black women’s loyalty. We argue that Black men’s political leanings reflect a complex interplay of gendered, racial, and ideological forces, particularly their attitudes toward Black women, white men, and broader policy concerns. We also argue that, compared with Black women, Black men disproportionately use Black-led podcasts as counterpublics, spaces outside mainstream consciousness to discuss issues internal to the Black community. Using content analysis of Black male–hosted podcasts from 2014–2025 and data from the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS), we show that Black men’s Democratic party support, although not as strong as Black women’s, remains robust. We introduce the Black Patriarchy Index, which captures dimensions of hostile sexism, bootstrap racial uplift ideology, and rejection of intersectional solidarity. Our findings demonstrate that the modest but significant rise in conservatism among Black men relative to Black women can be partially explained by higher scores on this index, illustrating how Black men’s conservative attitudes shape political ideology and party loyalty within the Black electorate.

The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Fordham University (US), Loyola Marymount University (US)
Princeton University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.