Retrofitting damaged reinforced concrete beam-column joints with carbon and basalt FRCM

This paper presents an experimental investigation of full-scale reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joints retrofitted with Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) composites. Four specimens were designed to fail in joint shear and subjected to a two-phase testing protocol simulating realistic retrofit scenarios. Initially, all specimens were cyclically loaded to approximately 85% of their estimated capacity to induce controlled damage in the joint panel representative of moderate seismic events. Following crack documentation, retrofitting with either carbon or basalt FRCM was applied, and specimens were tested to failure under the same cyclic loading protocol. The experimental program investigated two key parameters: the presence or absence of transverse reinforcement in the joint panel, and the influence of fiber type (carbon versus basalt). Experimental results show that FRCM repair substantially restored and enhanced structural capacity, with average strength increases ranging from 116% to 162% compared to pre-damage levels. Joints originally lacking transverse reinforcement exhibited greater relative gains (144–162%) than reinforced counterparts (116–128%), demonstrating higher repair efficiency for poorly detailed elements. Additional performance improvements included lower stiffness degradation during cyclic loading, and reduced damage accumulation. Instrumentation revealed significant fiber exploitation in both horizontal wrapping and vertical layers, indicating active participation in resisting shear demands. Carbon and basalt reinforcement performed comparably at the structural level, with carbon demonstrating slightly higher capacity enhancement. These findings validate FRCM repair as an effective retrofitting technique for beam-column connections, offering particular advantages for poor joints characteristic of aging structures requiring seismic upgrading. • Carbon and basalt FRCM configurations were used to repair damaged beam-column joints subject to lateral load. • Specimens with transverse reinforcement showed superior performance compared to unreinforced joints. • damage pattern is characterized by multiple diagonal cracks in the joint panel in all cases. • Carbon and basalt FRCM retrofitted joints showed similar hysteretic behavior and dissipated energy. • Results confirm FRCM composites as viable strengthening solutions for seismically deficient beam-column joints

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122662
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrofitting damaged reinforced concrete beam-column joints with carbon and basalt FRCM

Dario De Domenico, Teklewoin Haile Fitwi, Lorenzo Hofer, Giuseppe Ricciardi et al.
Engineering Structures
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Retrofitting damaged reinforced concrete beam-column joints with carbon and basalt FRCM

Dario De Domenico, Teklewoin Haile Fitwi, Lorenzo Hofer, Giuseppe Ricciardi, Flora Faleschini, Carlo Pellegrino, Klajdi Toska
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of full-scale reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joints retrofitted with Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) composites. Four specimens were designed to fail in joint shear and subjected to a two-phase testing protocol simulating realistic retrofit scenarios. Initially, all specimens were cyclically loaded to approximately 85% of their estimated capacity to induce controlled damage in the joint panel representative of moderate seismic events. Following crack documentation, retrofitting with either carbon or basalt FRCM was applied, and specimens were tested to failure under the same cyclic loading protocol. The experimental program investigated two key parameters: the presence or absence of transverse reinforcement in the joint panel, and the influence of fiber type (carbon versus basalt). Experimental results show that FRCM repair substantially restored and enhanced structural capacity, with average strength increases ranging from 116% to 162% compared to pre-damage levels. Joints originally lacking transverse reinforcement exhibited greater relative gains (144–162%) than reinforced counterparts (116–128%), demonstrating higher repair efficiency for poorly detailed elements. Additional performance improvements included lower stiffness degradation during cyclic loading, and reduced damage accumulation. Instrumentation revealed significant fiber exploitation in both horizontal wrapping and vertical layers, indicating active participation in resisting shear demands. Carbon and basalt reinforcement performed comparably at the structural level, with carbon demonstrating slightly higher capacity enhancement. These findings validate FRCM repair as an effective retrofitting technique for beam-column connections, offering particular advantages for poor joints characteristic of aging structures requiring seismic upgrading. • Carbon and basalt FRCM configurations were used to repair damaged beam-column joints subject to lateral load. • Specimens with transverse reinforcement showed superior performance compared to unreinforced joints. • damage pattern is characterized by multiple diagonal cracks in the joint panel in all cases. • Carbon and basalt FRCM retrofitted joints showed similar hysteretic behavior and dissipated energy. • Results confirm FRCM composites as viable strengthening solutions for seismically deficient beam-column joints

Engineering StructuresVol. 360
University of Messina (IT), University of Padua (IT)
Regione Siciliana
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.