Mapping motor point response areas in the calf during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) delivered transcutaneously activates skeletal muscle; its effectiveness is determined by stimulation parameters and by how skin-applied currents recruit underlying neuromuscular structures. Motor points (MPs) are commonly used to guide electrode placement; however, they are typically treated as discrete skin locations, and the spatial extent and reproducibility of surrounding responsive regions remain poorly characterised. Moreover, the minimum intensity required to elicit visible motor responses, and its variability over time, are seldom reported. The calf represents an appropriate model to examine these issues, as posterior calf stimulation produces visible ankle plantar flexion (PF). This study aimed to map stimulation response patterns in the skin associated with an identified MP in the posterior calf, assess their reproducibility, and determine the stimulation intensity required to elicit PF. METHODS: Thirty healthy adults underwent three weekly NMES sessions on the same calf. In each session, the same MP was stimulated at the lowest PF-eliciting intensity. A circular grid (5 cm radius) classified the surrounding skin as eliciting PF with muscle contraction (Zone 1), isolated muscle contraction (Zone 2), or no response (Zone 3). Areas were compared across sessions. Temporal stability was assessed using non-parametric tests and bootstrapping. Logistic regression examined associations between participant characteristics and response area size. RESULTS: . All zones showed consistent size across sessions. Higher physical activity and older age were inversely associated with Zone 2 size. CONCLUSION: MP activation during transcutaneous NMES is better described as a finite and reproducible cutaneous response area rather than a single skin location. PF is confined to a small, stable core region, while surrounding areas elicit weaker or absent motor responses. These findings have implications for how MPs are conceptualised and assessed in NMES protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-01999-4
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping motor point response areas in the calf during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Nelida Aliaga, Robin Juthberg, Paul W. Ackermann, Jafeth Lizana et al.
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Mapping motor point response areas in the calf during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Nelida Aliaga, Robin Juthberg, Paul W. Ackermann, Jafeth Lizana, Liv Nilsson Forsström
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) delivered transcutaneously activates skeletal muscle; its effectiveness is determined by stimulation parameters and by how skin-applied currents recruit underlying neuromuscular structures. Motor points (MPs) are commonly used to guide electrode placement; however, they are typically treated as discrete skin locations, and the spatial extent and reproducibility of surrounding responsive regions remain poorly characterised. Moreover, the minimum intensity required to elicit visible motor responses, and its variability over time, are seldom reported. The calf represents an appropriate model to examine these issues, as posterior calf stimulation produces visible ankle plantar flexion (PF). This study aimed to map stimulation response patterns in the skin associated with an identified MP in the posterior calf, assess their reproducibility, and determine the stimulation intensity required to elicit PF. METHODS: Thirty healthy adults underwent three weekly NMES sessions on the same calf. In each session, the same MP was stimulated at the lowest PF-eliciting intensity. A circular grid (5 cm radius) classified the surrounding skin as eliciting PF with muscle contraction (Zone 1), isolated muscle contraction (Zone 2), or no response (Zone 3). Areas were compared across sessions. Temporal stability was assessed using non-parametric tests and bootstrapping. Logistic regression examined associations between participant characteristics and response area size. RESULTS: . All zones showed consistent size across sessions. Higher physical activity and older age were inversely associated with Zone 2 size. CONCLUSION: MP activation during transcutaneous NMES is better described as a finite and reproducible cutaneous response area rather than a single skin location. PF is confined to a small, stable core region, while surrounding areas elicit weaker or absent motor responses. These findings have implications for how MPs are conceptualised and assessed in NMES protocols.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationVol. 23(1)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Karolinska Institutet
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.