Prediction of survival in patients with spinal metastatic disease

The spine is among the most frequent sites of metastatic disease, with an increasing prevalence, leading to increasing rates of surgical interventions. The choice of surgical technique (ranging from minimally invasive techniques, to radical resection), is usually based on expected survival, treatment-related morbidity, and outcome after treatment. A number of scoring systems have been developed to assess the predicted life expectancy of patients with spinal metastasis. Some of the most common predictive scoring systems include: the revised Tokuhashi score, the Tomita score, the modified Bauer score, the revised Katagiri, and the van der Linden scoring system; who are widely used and accepted. While many studies have reviewed the efficacy of historic scoring systems with positive results in many, an increasing amount of studies have shown that the accuracy of historic scoring systems is relatively low, and decreasing over time. The major hypothesis for the decreasing accuracy of these scores is the improved survival associated with new anticancer therapies. More recently, more modern scoring systems have emerged, such as the SORG nomogram, and machine learning algorithms, as well as open access application for clinicians. Even though a greater number of features is needed in order to establish prognosis, most of the features needed can be found in the patient's charts. They have been the subject of numerous studies to externally validate their efficacy, and it was shown that that the SORG Nomogram demonstrated the highest accuracy at predicting 30-day and 90-day survival after surgery. Although emerging scoring systems show promise in predicting survival, none should supplant multidisciplinary consultation when determining the indication for surgical intervention. Survival prediction alone should not serve as the sole justification for surgery, as careful consideration should also be given to the patient's overall clinical condition, psychological well-being, neurological status, and expected prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurochirurgie
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2026.101818
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of survival in patients with spinal metastatic disease

Aymeric Amelot, Elise Loubeyre
Neurochirurgie
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Prediction of survival in patients with spinal metastatic disease

Aymeric Amelot, Elise Loubeyre
article en

Abstract

The spine is among the most frequent sites of metastatic disease, with an increasing prevalence, leading to increasing rates of surgical interventions. The choice of surgical technique (ranging from minimally invasive techniques, to radical resection), is usually based on expected survival, treatment-related morbidity, and outcome after treatment. A number of scoring systems have been developed to assess the predicted life expectancy of patients with spinal metastasis. Some of the most common predictive scoring systems include: the revised Tokuhashi score, the Tomita score, the modified Bauer score, the revised Katagiri, and the van der Linden scoring system; who are widely used and accepted. While many studies have reviewed the efficacy of historic scoring systems with positive results in many, an increasing amount of studies have shown that the accuracy of historic scoring systems is relatively low, and decreasing over time. The major hypothesis for the decreasing accuracy of these scores is the improved survival associated with new anticancer therapies. More recently, more modern scoring systems have emerged, such as the SORG nomogram, and machine learning algorithms, as well as open access application for clinicians. Even though a greater number of features is needed in order to establish prognosis, most of the features needed can be found in the patient's charts. They have been the subject of numerous studies to externally validate their efficacy, and it was shown that that the SORG Nomogram demonstrated the highest accuracy at predicting 30-day and 90-day survival after surgery. Although emerging scoring systems show promise in predicting survival, none should supplant multidisciplinary consultation when determining the indication for surgical intervention. Survival prediction alone should not serve as the sole justification for surgery, as careful consideration should also be given to the patient's overall clinical condition, psychological well-being, neurological status, and expected prognosis.

NeurochirurgieVol. 72(3)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR), Thion Medical (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.