Fair practice reconsidered: Critical inside perspectives on grassroots policy development in the Dutch cultural labor market between 2012 and 2025

This article examines the emergence, institutionalization, and limits of fair practice as a response to precarity in the cultural sector, focusing on the development of the Fair Practice Code and the Artist Fee Guideline in the Netherlands between 2012 and 2025. It situates Dutch fair practice policy within an international genealogy of grassroots initiatives that challenged underpayment and the invisibility of artistic labor through moral claims and self-regulation. These initiatives have reshaped norms around payment and professionalism in arts institutions. However, while initially effective, the moral approach of fair practice advocacy has limited its capacity to challenge market-oriented policy and funding regimes. In its implementation, fair practice policy has increasingly functioned as a mechanism for managing scarcity rather than addressing its structural causes. To be more effective in future efforts, fair practice advocacy requires a clearer heterodox political-economic vision and alliances beyond the cultural sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205261443165
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair practice reconsidered: Critical inside perspectives on grassroots policy development in the Dutch cultural labor market between 2012 and 2025

Sepp Eckenhaussen, Koen Bartijn
Critical Sociology
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Fair practice reconsidered: Critical inside perspectives on grassroots policy development in the Dutch cultural labor market between 2012 and 2025

Sepp Eckenhaussen, Koen Bartijn
article en

Abstract

This article examines the emergence, institutionalization, and limits of fair practice as a response to precarity in the cultural sector, focusing on the development of the Fair Practice Code and the Artist Fee Guideline in the Netherlands between 2012 and 2025. It situates Dutch fair practice policy within an international genealogy of grassroots initiatives that challenged underpayment and the invisibility of artistic labor through moral claims and self-regulation. These initiatives have reshaped norms around payment and professionalism in arts institutions. However, while initially effective, the moral approach of fair practice advocacy has limited its capacity to challenge market-oriented policy and funding regimes. In its implementation, fair practice policy has increasingly functioned as a mechanism for managing scarcity rather than addressing its structural causes. To be more effective in future efforts, fair practice advocacy requires a clearer heterodox political-economic vision and alliances beyond the cultural sector.

Critical Sociology
Avans University of Applied Sciences (NL), Royal Academy of Art (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.