Action-Bound AI Safety: A Pre-Commitment Runtime Framework for Physical, Cyber-Physical, and Transactional Systems

This manuscript proposes Action-Bound AI Safety, a pre-commitment runtime framework for physical, cyber-physical, transactional, and agentic systems. The central claim is narrow: runtime oversight can improve intervention success when monitoring occurs before externally consequential commitment, provided three conditions remain available — usable signal, enough time, and retained intervention authority. The framework introduces commitment boundaries, pre-action buffers, phase-sensitive escalation, Safety Slack (S_t; Naing's Equation), and commitment gates. It treats runtime safety as a control problem: whether the system can detect risk early enough, interpret it reliably enough, and still possess authority to halt, gate, roll back, throttle, or safely degrade an action before it becomes irreversible. The manuscript is presented as a theory-first engineering framework and falsifiable research program, not as empirical validation, deployable safety software, or a completed mathematical proof of safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19764381
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Action-Bound AI Safety: A Pre-Commitment Runtime Framework for Physical, Cyber-Physical, and Transactional Systems

Htet Ko Ko Naing
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Action-Bound AI Safety: A Pre-Commitment Runtime Framework for Physical, Cyber-Physical, and Transactional Systems

Htet Ko Ko Naing
article en

Abstract

This manuscript proposes Action-Bound AI Safety, a pre-commitment runtime framework for physical, cyber-physical, transactional, and agentic systems. The central claim is narrow: runtime oversight can improve intervention success when monitoring occurs before externally consequential commitment, provided three conditions remain available — usable signal, enough time, and retained intervention authority. The framework introduces commitment boundaries, pre-action buffers, phase-sensitive escalation, Safety Slack (S_t; Naing's Equation), and commitment gates. It treats runtime safety as a control problem: whether the system can detect risk early enough, interpret it reliably enough, and still possess authority to halt, gate, roll back, throttle, or safely degrade an action before it becomes irreversible. The manuscript is presented as a theory-first engineering framework and falsifiable research program, not as empirical validation, deployable safety software, or a completed mathematical proof of safety.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.